Tag: accompaniment

“Obeying the Ten Commandments paralyzes you!” (False Prophet)

A+M+D+G

In another in a long stream of apparent attacks on his critics, Pope Francis gave a homily last week accusing Christians who avoid taking risks out of concern for the Ten Commandments as suffering from “cowardliness,” warning that such people become “paralyzed” and unable to “go forward.”

“‘Not taking risks, please, no… prudence

Obeying all the commandments, all of them…,’”
“Yes, it’s true, but this paralyzes you …   (February 1, 2017 (LifeSiteNews.com)

I’ve been thinking about this latest evil stupidity … and the ramifications.

First of all, I couldn’t make sense of it because its ‘chaos‘ of course… so I shouldn’t be trying. Secondly I thought, “Imagine each of commandments in turn… and what he is therefore proposing by this ‘false courage’ to supposedly make us ‘go forward’ while breaking commandments’!

The Ten Commandments, in order10-cm

(http://www.dummies.com/religion/christianity/catholicism/catholicism-and-the-ten-commandments/ )

  1. “I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me.”

This commandment forbids idolatry, the worship of false gods and goddesses, and it excludes polytheism, the belief in many gods, insisting instead on monotheism, the belief in one God. This commandment forbids making golden calves, building temples to Isis, and worshipping statues of Caesar, for example. 

But according to the FP who overrides Divine Law, we should be prudent in this. Go worship in a Moslem temple today. Yoga, Reiki? All good. Recognise other religious leaders as honouring God t00. Promote and honour heretics because God wasn’t all that jealous and didn’t really mean it. He meant us to be prudent and just do it every other day!!

  1. “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.”

The faithful are required to honour the name of God. It makes sense that if you’re to love God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, then you’re naturally to respect the name of God with equal passion and vigor.

But the Fp might say: “What’s a little slip every now and then? Eh? Especially in Italian… Wear those blasphemous T shirts too. What’s the harm, eh? Don’t reflect on this too much in your life as it might make you ‘confined’ in speech and action. Maybe just don’t do it in church on Sunday.”

  1. “Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day.”

The Lord God made the seventh day, a day of holy rest. Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox Christians go to church on Sunday, treating it as the Lord’s Day to honor the day Christ rose from the dead. 

The FP  says, “Best to be prudent about that. The World Peace Soccer Match is a good one or any soccer match because sports leads us to God. I would discern whether its right for you today. As long as YOU are at peace with that decision.”

  1. “Honour thy father and mother.”

This commandment obliges the faithful to show respect for their parents — as children and adults. Children must obey their parents, and adults must respect and see to the care of their parents, when they become old and infirm. They should not do anything to dishonour their parents or bring blame upon them. 

Well, you guessed it, the FP says, “Its all optional and depends how you see it. Maybe euthanasia is the prudent way to honour them in old age. Think hard about that one. Also honour them by breaking a few commands because it actually helps them in their old fashioned ‘rigidity’. Don’t be paralysed over it. It frees them of hang ups.”

5.“Thou shalt not kill.”

…Unless its through population control programs or contraceptive abortifacents for nuns in the Congo or a loved one needing Euthanasia. Maybe it means babies in the womb, in some circumstances (because you can’t be too confined, you have to be prudent with the Commandments) but don’t worry, we will make absolution quick, easy and painless– you don’t even have to confess!  Also “Do not kill” doesn’t strictly apply if you’re a Moslem. In that case you are just obeying your religion’s divine commands which is obviously, more prudent. And if a Moslem comes at you with a machete, let him into the church. Accompany him and do some dialogue- if you live long enough.”

The better translation from the Hebrew would be “Thou shalt not murder” — a subtle distinction but an important one to the Church. Killing an innocent person is considered murder. Killing an unjust aggressor to preserve your own life is still killing, but it isn’t considered murder or immoral. 

Exactly who the unjust aggressors are in Francis’ eyes? Traditionalists! Worst type of people. 

  1. “Thou shalt not commit adultery.”

The sixth and ninth commandments honor human sexuality. This commandment forbids the actual, physical act of having immoral sexual activity, specifically adultery, which is sex with someone else’s spouse or a spouse cheating on their partner. This commandment also includes fornication, which is sex between unmarried people, prostitution, pornography, homosexual activity, masturbation, group sex, rape, incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and necrophilia.

I don’t think I need to comment on that. We all know what the FP thinks about Sacramental marriage, living together and having a few babies first, adultery, chastity and re-marriage without annulment. Be prudent in not keeping that Commandment!!! Really the majority of marriages are invalid today- if you can convince yourself of that. Anyway they must not be really Divine Commands but are more like flexible guidelines.

  1. “Thou shalt not steal.”

The seventh and tenth commandments focus on respecting and honoring the possessions of others. This commandment forbids the act of taking someone else’s property. The Catholic Church believes that this commandment also denounces cheating people of their money or property.

…Unless you are Francis stealing the Crucifix from the coffin of someone you admired. See Cardinal Pell went a little too far in uncovering and trying to prevent corruption in the Vatican Finances dept. Then you should not be so worried about that commandment. We shouldn’t be so confined and judgmental in our view.

  1. “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.”

The Eighth Commandment condemns lying. Because God is regarded as the author of all truth, the Church believes that humans are obligated to honor the truth. The most obvious way to fulfill this commandment is not to lie — intentionally deceive another by speaking a falsehood.

Francis would never speak a falsehood, would he? He wouldn’t twist the truth, would he? Oh, but it doesn’t matter-that’s right, we can’t follow all the Commandments exactly! Not all the time! Don’t strive for that.

  1. “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife.”

The Ninth Commandment forbids the intentional desire and longing for immoral sexuality. To sin in the heart, Jesus says, is to lust after a woman or a man in your heart with the desire and will to have immoral sex with them. Just as human life is a gift from God and needs to be respected, defended, and protected, so, too, is human sexuality. Catholicism regards human sexuality as a divine gift, so it’s considered sacred in the proper context — marriage. 

BUT, says FP, it must be OK if you consider them your wife, in some sort of way (or partner, re-partner)..that will fix that one! Just read AL to find out more. If your current re-marriage is not fulfilling your lust enough because she wants to remain continent, that’s a valid reason to lust after another’s wife or husband or to force them to submit to you. Its better if you just be realistic and commit adultery in an ongoing fashion in your concrete situation. Divine Laws were made for angels, not real men.

  1. “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s goods.”

The Tenth Commandment forbids the wanting of, or taking someone else’s property. Along with the Seventh Commandment, this commandment condemns theft and the feelings of envy, greed, and jealousy in reaction to what other people have.

But FP is telling us, we can covet them sometimes. Maybe its OK to covet someone’s power and position as well as their goods… Anyway, the best way is to force coercion:  take everything off everyone (except those in power). Enforce Communism! Enshrine Liberation theology. That’s the way to prudently keep that Commandment. Then you won’t have to worry about being too confined in your approach, will you?

Clearly then, the FP  saying what he did about the Commandments, has great consequences. Because lastly, Our Blessed Mother fulfils diligently and perfectly all the Commandments and therefore acts in this ‘confined manner’ and is accused by the FP of lack of courage and going forward. He accuses her of acting wrongly.

In fact I’d say, using that teaching on the Commandments, he accuses Jesus too, St Joseph, all the Saints and all those who try to live God’s Commandments and love their neighbour. They were/are all wrong and, apparently, following their example, stunts our growth!!  In fact, why did God even bother giving The Commandments?

And inscribing them in stone in a holy, miraculous and glorious manner?? 

Apparently it was so that we could tread all over them and break them- not follow them! 

What a hell-ish sermon that is.

What a twisted Gospel.

What a false prophet.

But His Church will be restored and The Commandments too – through Our Lady’s Triumph.

This is the Truth and it must be spoken. It has been brewing within me and the Lord gave me this reading this morning to confirm it:

Shemaiah’s False Prophecy: Jeremiah 29: 24-32 (from https://www.biblegateway.com )

24 To Shemaiah of Nehelam you shall say: 25 “Thus says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel: You have sent letters in your name to all the people who are in Jerusalem, and to Zephaniah the son of Maaseiah the priest, and to all the priests, saying, 26 ‘The Lord has made you priest instead of Jehoiada the priest, to have charge in the House of the Lord, over every madman who prophesies, to put him in the stocks and neck irons. 27 Now why have you not rebuked Jeremiah of Anathoth who is prophesying to you? 28 For he has sent to us in Babylon, saying, “Your exile will be long; build houses and live in them, and plant gardens and eat their produce.”

29 Zephaniah the priest read this letter in the hearing of Jeremiah the prophet.

30 Then the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah: 31 “Send to all the exiles, saying, ‘Thus says the Lord concerning Shemaiah of Nehelam: Because Shemaiah had prophesied to you when I did not send him, and has made you trust in a lie, 32 therefore thus says the Lord: Behold, I will punish Shemaiah of Nehelam and his descendants. He shall not have anyone living among this people, and he shall not see the good that I will do to my people, declares the Lord, for he has preached apostasy from the Lord.’

And so we must re-iterate the Word of The Lord and The Ten Commandments at every turn.

Who dares now to listen to and be formed by Francis?

Who dares obey him?

It will be as with Shemaiah.

And if you listen to this False Prophet not sent by God, who has called himself a priest and in charge, in the House of the Lord over Pope Benedict, as Shemiaiah did to Jehoiada,  you will be treated as his descendants and not see the good that The Lord has planned.

Jeremiah has warned you this day.

By DonnaLiane

Language of the Synod 1 – Error and Truth – Bishop Schneider

The information below is taken from the interview with Bishop Athanasius Schneider (dated Nov. 2nd 2015) and published in Rorate Caeli. (dated Nov. 2nd 2015)
The full article can be read here:
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2015/11/rorate-exclusive-bishop-athanasius.html

“All is OK. The Synod did not change doctrine”.
Yet such a perception… ignores the back door and the pending time bombs…”

Error: The new concept of mercy (without repentance).

Truth:
The most merciful act …would be to draw the attention to this danger by means of a clear…admonition about the necessarily full acceptance of the Sixth Commandment of God. They have to call the things by their right name exhorting: “divorce is divorce,” “adultery is adultery” and “who commits consciously and freely grave sins against the Commandments of God – and in this case against the Sixth Commandment – and dies unrepentantly will receive eternal condemnation being excluded forever from the kingdom of God.”

The new language used by Synod fathers to promote their concept of “mercy”.

Way of discernment
Accompaniment
Orientations of the bishop
Dialogue with the priest
Forum internum
A more fuller integration into the life of the church

Way of discernment:

“…there is talk of “repentance” (Final Report, n. 85), there remains nevertheless a great deal of ambiguity. In fact,… ,(according to Cardinal Kasper and other clergy) – such a repentance concerns the past sins against the spouse of the first valid marriage and the repentance of the divorced indeed may not refer to the acts of their marital cohabitation with the new civilly married partner.”

Error
Cardinal Kasper and others have repeatedly affirmed that “a judgement in the conscience in that case has to be considered as being correct even when the divorced and remarried continue to cohabitate in a marital manner, and that they should not be required to live in complete continence as brother and sister.”

Truth
In the Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio of Pope John Paul II, it is stated: “The way to the Eucharist can only be granted to those who take on themselves the duty to live in complete continence, that is, by abstinence from the acts proper to married couples”.
This statement was selectively omitted from the Final Report.
Saint Augustine affirmed: “Who dismisses his adulterous wife and marries another woman, whereas his first wife still lives, remains perpetually in the state of adultery. Such a man does not any efficacious penance while he refuses to abandon the new wife. If he is a catechumen, he cannot be admitted to baptism, because his will remains rooted in the evil. If he is a (baptized) penitent, he cannot receive the (ecclesiastical) reconciliation as long as he does not break with his bad attitude” (De adulterinis coniugiis, 2, 16).

A more fuller integration into the life of the church

Error:
Numbers 84 -86 of the final Report does not directly say that the divorced and remarried can be admitted to Holy Communion. Statements such as “a more full participation in the life of the Church” and “discernment and integration” are the expressions which were used. These are ambiguous expressions and were a clever tactic. It would be well to remember – “You made void the word of God by introducing your own tradition” (Mark 7: 13).

Truth:
By the use of such tactics, the Final Report in fact put time bombs and a back door for the admittance of the divorced and remarried to Holy Communion. Doctrine has not been changed but such statements can lead to abuses and true meaning of doctrine.

Christ demanded from all His disciples to speak in an extremely clear manner: “Let what you say be ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil” (Math 5: 37). This is valid all the more when the Shepherds of the Church preach or when the Magisterium speaks in a document.

Error:
The Final Report in n. 84 pleads for an admittance of the divorced and remarried to liturgical, pastoral and educational offices.

Truth:
Such a proposal represents an indirect support to the culture of divorce and a practical denial of an objectively sinful lifestyle. The Apostle Saint James said: “But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves” (James 1: 22). Their life continuously contradicts their words.

Pope John Paul II ... indicated only the following possibilities of participating in the life of the Church, which for their part aim a true conversion:
“They should be encouraged to listen to the word of God,
to attend the Sacrifice of the Mass,
to persevere in prayer,
to contribute to works of charity
and to community efforts in favor of justice,
to bring up their children in the Christian faith,
to cultivate the spirit and
practice of penance and thus
implore, day by day, God’s grace” (Familiaris Consortio, 84).

As long as they continue giving a public anti-witness to the indissolubility of marriage and contributing to a culture of divorce, the divorced and remarried cannot exercise those liturgical, catechetical and institutional ministries in the Church, which demand by their own nature a public life in accordance with the Commandments of God.

Public violators of the Sixth Commandment, such as divorced and remarried, cannot be admitted to the office of lectors, godparents or catechists.

Accompaniment and orientations of the bishop.

Error:
The Final Report seems to leave the solution of the question of the admittance of the divorced and remarried to Holy Communion to local Church authorities: “accompaniment of the priests” and “orientations of the bishop.”

Truth:
By allowing individual local bishops and priests to guide these people and make decisions about their “worthiness” means that the Church will no longer be one. Doctrine could be interpreted and applied differently all over the world. This cannot be – it “contradicts the very essence of being Catholic”.

The Final Report …avoids confessing the unchangeable principle of the entire Catholic tradition, that those who live in an invalid marital union can be admitted to Holy Communion only under the condition that their promise to live in complete continence and avoid public scandal. John Paul II and Benedict XVI confirmed strongly this Catholic principle.”

At the Council of Nicea in the 4th Century, when the heresy of Arianism was ramoant, similar tactics were used – “who invented continuously other expressions in order not to confess directly the consubstantiality of the Son of God with God the Father.” This resulted in continuous synodal meetings and a proliferation of new doctrinal formula – deliberately avoiding clarity in terminology.