The Rock

AM+DG

Only the Successor of Peter can be “The Rock” on which the Catholic Church stands.

This article by Bro Alexis Bugnolo by describing how Luther, Calvin and Henry VIII led the Church into apostasy, but –

“… no part of the Church has even fallen into a Apostasy when it remained united to the true Pope. …

This is why now 99.99% of the Catholic Church is being led into Apostasy. Because they are no longer united in reality with the true Pope, though many are still fooled about this.

And this is why Bergoglio has such power. Because the first sin, which gives him power over you, is in holding that Pope Benedict XVI resigned the papacy, when 5 minutes of examination of Canon Law and the Papal Declaration can prove that he never resigned.  …”

He concludes with:

If priests want to be truly effective, you need to return to communion with the Vicar of the Sacred Heart of Jesus: Pope Benedict XVI. Bergoglio will never have that effect, because he is the Vicar of nobody, but the vain imaginations of giddy Cardinals who were, as Pope Benedict XVI implied on Feb. 11, 2013, not competent to elect his Successor.”

This is a very thought provoking article. Read it all at the link below:

via The Rock

We can see what has happened to the Church since the usurper took over.

There is widespread apostasy – never seen on a scale like this before; heresies and blasphemies abound; paganism has been introduced into the Church and the Amazonian synod consecrated to the idols of Pachamama ( i. e. to evil).

This usurper mocks the holy and has a knack of twisting Christ’s teachings into meaning something that they do not mean. He has approved of persons indulging in sins of the worst kind in the name of “tolerance”. He introduced Amoris Laetitia into the Magisterium through a back door (by means of a letter). He has profaned the Sacraments

He actually calls people names, especially faithful Catholics. There has never been a “pope” such as this : quite “unholy”.

Let’s face it. Francis is the THE False Prophet (of Revelation). He is preparing the world for the Anti-christ.

Ven. Archbishop Fulton Sheen said:“The False Prophet will have a religion without a cross. A religion without a world to come. A religion to destroy religions. There will be a counterfeit church. Christ’s Church [the Catholic Church] will be one. And the False Prophet will create the other. The false church will be worldly, ecumenical, and global. It will be a loose federation of churches. And religions forming some type of global association. A world parliament of churches. It will be emptied of all divine content and will be the mystical body of the Antichrist.

Sadly, we can see all this happening before our eyes.

Prophecies from the Book of Truth:

This pope may be elected by members within the Catholic Church, but he will be the false prophet. His electors are wolves in sheep’s clothing and are members of the secret Masonic and evil group led by Satan. This is how Satan will try to destroy My Church. Sadly, he will, this false prophet, attract a large following. Those who oppose him will be persecuted.April 12th, 2012

They plan to replace the Holy Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI, with a dictator of lies. He will create a new church in league with the antichrist and his group, in order to deceive the world.” – January 18th, 2012

“My beloved Pope Benedict XVI is the last true pope on this Earth”. – April 12th, 2012

See more prophecies about The False Prophet  in the next post

Pope Benedict still acts like the Pope and this gives us comfort.

AM+DG

Pope Benedict XVI is not afraid to speak up, when necessary.

1.Earlier this month there was  one journalist who spoke about  “bookgate”.

The book written By Sarah and Benedict undermined the announcement of the pretend pope-  the False Prophet – of his Exhortation on the Amazonian Synod. The “Instrumentem Laboris”  for the synod had been announced weeks beforehand. It was evident what was on the agenda. Pope Benedict and Cardinal Sarah took action. Their book on celibacy was written and published before the pretend pope was able to announce his exhortation.  It was reported that he was angry! He was afraid that he would lose some of the support that he had hoped for. Not surprisingly, these matters then, were not addressed directly in the Exhortation. But you have to read between the lines. He DID say, that he DID NOT NEED to go over the final document of the synod, because wqe should READ IT FOR OURSELVES. Some very naïve people, who want only to be reassured that this (pope?) has some goodness and Truth left in him, thought that a BIG MISTAKE had been avoided.

In an article describing this event( February 13, 2020 ), Br. Alexis Bugnolo wrote:

Sandro Magister has at last spilled the beans — as we say in English — that is, he has told us what really happened during the recent Book Flap over the defense of the Priestly Celibacy by His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI and Cardinal Robert Sarah, the only Cardinal in any position in the Roman Curia, who was appointed to his office by Pope Benedict XVI.

The Main Stream Media has run with the story that it was Bergoglio who fired Archbishop Georg Gänswein for not preventing that Book from going to press and obstructing its publication as a work of the Cardinal and the Pope.

But Magister, apologist extraordinaire for the Argentine Regime at the Vatican, in a report on his official Blog at L’Espresso, says what really happened. In a post entitled,Il silenzio di Francesco, le lacrime di Ratzinger e quella sua dichiarazione mai pubblicata in which he speaks in a noticeable intent to humiliate the reigning Pontiff by calling him by his civil name — he says that it was Benedict who first detected Gänswein’s treachery and took decisive action to circumvent his interference.

Magister (explains):

Well, the morning of Wednesday, January 15th, while pope Francis was holding his weekly general audience and Gänswein was sitting, according to the rule, at his side in the Paul VI Hall, far indeed from the Monastery Mater Ecclesiae which is the residence of the Pope Emeritus, of whom he is the secretary, Benedict XVI personally picked up the phone and called Sara first at his home, where he did not find him, and then in his office, where the Cardinal picked up.

Benedict XVI expressed, in a heartfelt manner, his solidarity with Sarah. He confided in him that he had not understood the reasons for such a violent and unjust aggression.  And he wept. Sarah also wept. The phone call ended with both of them in tears.

Magister also reports that Cardinal Sarah and Pope Benedict then wrote up a joint Statement and had Gänswein bring it over to the sostituto of the Secretary of State,

Thus it is not surprising in the least that the communication written by the Pope and Cardinal never saw the light of day. But Magister says, that the Italian Version of the Book, was defended by the Publisher a few days later, with a public statement crafted by Cardinal Parolin himself, word for word, praising the book.

“…But the real news is this. Pope Benedict XVI is as fiesty as ever. He had no illusions about the Archbishop which would have made him hesitant to break faith with him and make his own phone call behind the Archbishop’s back. He then began direct relations with Cardinal Sarah and was devastated to hear how his former personal secretary had betrayed him in the public press.

… The events related by Magister point to a significant moment in history. That was when Pope Benedict XVI unplugged Gänswein. The Italians call it, defenistrazione, which is a colorful word deriving from Late Latin, meaning to throw someone out of their office through the window, rather than letting them resign with dignity by leaving the office through the door after a resignation.

That is really why the Archbishop disappeared. Bergoglio could not fire him. Only the Pope can do that.”

From:

Benedict, not Francis, unplugged Gänswein

2. Pope Benedict had spoken up (July 17, 2017) at Cardinal Meisner’s funeral  when he said that

“he was moved at the dubia cardinal’s ability to “live out of a deep conviction that the Lord does not abandon His Church, even when the boat has taken on so much water as to be on the verge of capsizing.”

The Church “stands in particularly pressing need of convincing shepherds who can resist the dictatorship of the spirit of the age and who live and think the faith with determination,” Pope Benedict said in a message read by Archbishop Georg Gänswein, his personal secretary and head of the papal household. Because of this “pressing need,” Meisner “found it difficult to leave his post.”

The article also stated:

” Canon lawyer Kurt Martens said Pope Benedict’s message was an “amazing yet diplomatic form of support for [the] dubia Cardinals.”

In June 2017, Pope Benedict met new cardinals alongside Pope Francis. He had a brief message for them: “The Lord wins in the end.”

https://revelationstwelve.wordpress.com/2017/07/17/pope-benedict-xvi-sobering-message-at-cardinals-funeral-church-on-verge-of-capsizing/

3. More recently he was impelled to correct the error regarding clerical sexual abuse at the US Conference of Bishops in April, 2019:

Pope Benedict’s letter re Clerical sexual abuse to USCCB April 2019

By Jason Horowitz

  • April 11, 2019

ROME — In his retirement, Pope Benedict XVI is apparently tired of hiding.

The former pontiff, who declared he would “remain hidden to the world” when he became the first pope in six centuries to abdicate in 2013, has released a 6,000-word letter that puts the blame for the clerical sexual abuse crisis in the Roman Catholic Church on the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the disappearance of God from public discourse in the West and what he considers dangerously liberal theological ideas that eroded morality after the church reforms of the Second Vatican Council.

The deeply theological and esoteric missive, which Benedict called his contribution “in this difficult hour” for the church, was written “absolutely on his own” by Benedict, according to Archbishop Georg Gänswein, Benedict’s longtime personal secretary, who is also the prefect of the papal household under Pope Francis.

In writing the letter, Benedict realized the fears of many church experts who have argued that having two pontiffs living at the same time was a recipe for pastoral, theological and political disaster and could lead to confusion among the faithful.

Although Benedict wrote that he gave his successor and the Vatican’s Secretariat of State a heads up about the letter, it amounted to the most significant undercutting yet of the authority of Pope Francis, who has instead blamed a systemic abuse of power and an unhealthy adoration of authority within the church’s hierarchy for the crisis.

Read the whole article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/world/europe/pope-benedict-letter-sex-abuse.html    

and also read about it here:

https://www.biography.com/news/pope-francis-pope-benedict-relationship

“The letter publicly undercut Francis, whose views on the subject had already been made public. “

4. Finally, there are other ways that  Pope Benedict XVI speaks up, not in words, but visually.

The following is taken from Ann Barnhardt’s English transcript of her video:

0:55:57 Visual evidence.

Pope Benedict continues to wear the Papal White and his Papal Ring. Pope Benedict was asked, ‘why do you still wear,’ after he had faux-abdicated and run off, ‘why do you continue to wear the Papal White?’ And the answer he gave was such a massive, bald-faced lie that the first thing that occurred to me was this has got to be a coded cry for help. Again, you don’t want to be a conspiracy theorist and all that, absolutely, but listen to what he said. He said there weren’t any black cassocks for him to wear. You announce your intention to abdicate three weeks before the effective date, so he announces on 11 February and the effective date is 8:00 pm on the 28th of February, so you’ve got basically three weeks here, and you live in Rome, a city that has more black cassocks than any city on the face of the earth. And you’re the Vicar of Jesus Christ on earth. You can’t pick up the phone and call one of the clerical outfitters, or whoever your personal tailor is, and say, look, I need a black cassock, presumably with red piping, or just a black cassock? It’s such a bald-faced lie that, in charity, one has to assume that he’s trying to signal. That he’s desperately trying to signal something. I’m wearing the Papal White because there weren’t any black cassocks for me to wear. He’s made this decision. This is his free choice. He could have gotten a full new wardrobe anytime he wanted in the past five and a half years, and yet every day he gets on and he puts on the Papal White. He gets up and he puts on the Papal White. And he continues to wear his Papal Ring.

0:58:11 Pope Benedict retains his Papal name, Pope Benedict.

This is breaking all previous precedent and also the wearing of the Papal White. That also breaks all previous precedent. In previous precedent, whenever a Pope would resign, he gave up every physical indication of the Papacy. He reverted to black, he dropped, of course, the Papal name, he reverted to being Cardinal so-and-so, or Bishop so-and-so, or Abbot so-and-so, whatever it was, so that there would be absolutely no confusion about anything. And then he went very far away. So, Pope Benedict retains his Papal name, he’s called Pope Benedict, and his Papal Style. The Papal Style is the courtesy title that someone is given and in the case of the Pope it’s Your Holiness/His Holiness/Holiness. He is still called, all day every day, His Holiness Pope Benedict, or His Holiness Pope Emeritus, but as we’ve talked about, the whole notion of a Pope Emeritus is completely false. Non-existent. It’s a fiction. He’s chosen this. He could have said get me a black cassock and go back to calling me Cardinal Ratzinger, Archbishop Ratzinger, whatever he wanted. He could’ve reverted to that. Did he do that? Does he do that? No. Every day he gets up and he retains these visible signs of the Petrine Office.

0:59:46  Pope Benedict continues to reside in the Vatican, completely unprecedented.

All resigned Popes, they would either go away completely voluntarily, never to be seen again. They would go check into a monastery somewhere, and they would never be seen publicly again, or they were chased out. A lot of times these were completely contentious situations, and the Pope would be chased out, and sometimes he was even imprisoned. Pope Benedict could’ve gone anywhere. In fact, he was on the record before all of this happened in February of 2013, as saying that all he wanted to do before he was elected Pope in 2005, his big, grand plan was he wanted to go back to Bavaria. He wanted to live in a little house with his brother, Georg Ratzinger, and their sister, who was alive at the time, and his cat, and play the piano, and write, and live out the rest of his life like that. Why didn’t he do that? He could have. Why didn’t he do it? Why is he still living inside the Vatican and making public appearances as the Pope? We have this incredible visual evidence. It’s right in front of us.

Read all of Ann’s article here:

Bergoglian Antipapacy Video Transcript

5. Other signals Pope Benedict XVI gives.

The pope’s signature is usually in the format “NN. PP. x”  (Supreme Pontiff)  (Pastor Pastorum)

From  Antonio Socci  of Church Militant:

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pope-francis-church-that-goes-out-is-goingoutof-catholicism

“… The signals he gives are always discreet, but clear and comforting. Not only by means of powerful interventions like the document he issued last April, but also by recalling that he – that is, the pope – is there and Catholics should not feel that they are orphans.

The latest (truly beautiful) book which Ratzinger has published, “Per Amore,” does not carry on its cover the title “Pope Emeritus” but the firm signature “Benedetto PP XVI.” These initials “PP” stand for “Pastor Pastorum” (or Pater Patrum), which is the title and prerogative of the reigning pontiff. 

Antonio Socci, also mentions in this article his “coat of arms”

Socci says:

“There are those who believe that by a mysterious design of Divine Providence, the Church is being subjected to a very harsh trial, its own Good Friday, but that the presence of Benedict guarantees that She will not be shipwrecked. Certainly Benedict is central in the Church today. And one day everything will become clearer. “

________________________________

Bro. Alexis Bugnolo states (see link below):

“Notice the facts, which are indisputable:

  1. Benedict is dressed as the Pope.
  2. All continue to treat him as the Pope.
  3. He is given official escort as a Head of State by the Italian Republic
  4. He flies, not to Munich, where his brother lives, but to Castel Gandolfo, the private residence of THE POPE.

Any objective observer must therefore conclude, that he remains the Pope, and is signaling that he remains the Pope. Because he is acting as the Pope, retiring from a Vatican that no longer wants him, but NOT as a Pope who has just resigned the Papacy.

https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/09/15/benedict-said-in-every-way-that-he-did-not-resign-an-examination-of-his-testimonies/

________________________________

It’s no wonder then, that  the “pretend pope” (Francis) got angry about the recent book by  PBXVI and Card. Sarah!

His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI may not seem to speak up very often, and it must be so difficult to do so, while he is constantly being watched, but he still certainly makes his presence felt!

He might be old, but his very presence must be a thorn in the side of the enemy!

 

 

 

Abp. Bergoglio+Scandal= Pope Francis+Scandal

AM+DG

A History of Scandal! What else could you expect?

A friend, whom I often quote on this site, sent me an article about an Argentinian bishop, who made an observational comment about Bergoglio, based on personal experience, from when they were both bishops in Argentina.

“Mario Bergoglio, Archbishop of Buenos Aires Vs. Archbishop Hector Aguer, Archbishop of La Plata.

They were both auxiliary Bishops in Buenos Aires between 1992 and 1998.

In 1998 Bergoglio was installed as  Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires and  Archbishop Hector Aguer as Archbishop of the Archdiocese of La Plata.

We were told by our conservative Catholic hosts that their perception was that Archbishop Aguer had always been the orthodox/traditional one..…. and that Bergoglio was perceived to be the radical liberal.

Aguer is generally considered a representative of the conservative sector of the Argentine Church. In homilies and episcopal documents, he has harshly criticized the proposed legalization of abortion in Argentina, some government-sponsored sex education plans and contraception campaigns, the secularisation of culture, the idea of abolishing the requirement of clerical celibacy, the persecution of and discrimination against Christians, consumerism, “rock culture”, etc.

Now the point is that Archbishop Aguer was the Archbishop that these orthodox/true Catholics from the Buenos Aires area trusted and believed was upholding the authentic Catholic faith…….definitely not Bergoglio… he was a renowned ‘lefty’.

Interesting that in our Church today that the Traditional (orthodox) priests and bishops seem to be assigned the lesser parishes and dioceses.

In this case, the radical lefty gets the bigger diocese and finishes up on the Chair of Peter.    

And it is also very interesting to have Archbishop Aguer now emerge and point out that Bergoglio is considered a ‘moral relativist’.

Remember Pope Benedict back in April 2005, criticizing the dictatorship of relativism.We are building a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one’s own ego and desires.’……...and we know who the ‘dictator of relativism’ is in 2020.      

Tony”

The article follows:

Argentinian Archbishop: Francis Is Considered A “Moral Relativist”

The politicians who are about to introduce abortion in Argentina, are “morally relativists,and they must think “that Pope Francis is one too,former La Plata Archbishop Hector Aguer wrote on InfoCatolica.com (February 1).

Arguer observed that Fernández and his second concubine received Communion from Argentinean-born Archbishop Sánchez Sorondo during a Eucharist in the Vatican,

“This is incredible, but between fellow countrymen of the same rank everything is finally possible. One more scandal, among many others…”

See: https://gloria.tv/post/j8BP4AjkKeA94kxoMvv2zz9fT

What this confirms (important for all those who are still doubters) – is that Bergoglio has not changed.

I will add here an article written by a Buenos Aires journalist  about Bergoglio, on the day he was elected. At the time, it seemed rather extreme to many people, (except for those who read the Book of Truth) .

From:  https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-horror-buenos-aires-journalist.html

” We have many friends around the world, including in the dear Argentine Republic. And we asked a cherished friend, Marcelo González, of Panorama Católico Internacional, who knows the Church of Argentina as well as the palm of his hand, to send us a report on the (then) new pope. Here it goes:

Horror!

Of all the unthinkable candidates, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perhaps the worst. Not because he openly professes doctrines against the faith and morals, but because, judging from his work as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, faith and morals seem to have been irrelevant to him!

A sworn enemy of the Traditional Mass, he has only allowed imitations of it in the hands of declared enemies of the ancient liturgy. He has persecuted every single priest who made an effort to wear a cassock, preach with firmness, or that was simply interested in Summorum Pontificum.

Famous for his inconsistency (at times, for the unintelligibility of his addresses and homilies), accustomed to the use of coarse, demagogical, and ambiguous expressions, it cannot be said that his magisterium is heterodox, but rather non-existent; for how confusing it is.

His entourage in the Buenos Aires Curia, with the exception of a few clerics, has not been characterized by the virtue of their actions. Several are under grave suspicion of moral misbehavior.

He has not missed any occasion for holding acts in which he lent his Cathedral to Protestants, Muslims, Jews, and even to partisan groups in the name of an impossible and unnecessary interreligious dialogue. He is famous for his meetings with Protestants in the Luna Park arena where, together with preacher of the Pontifical House, Raniero Cantalamessa,he was “blessed” by Protestant ministers, in a common act of worship in which he, in practice, accepted the validity of the “powers” of the TV-pastors.

This election is incomprehensible: he is not a polyglot, he has no Curial experience, he does not shine for his sanctity, he is loose in doctrine and liturgy, he has not fought against abortion and only very weakly against homosexual “marriage” [approved with practically no opposition from the episcopate], he has no manners to honor the Pontifical Throne. He has never fought for anything else than to remain in positions of power.

It really cannot be what Benedict wanted for the Church. And he does not seem to have any of the conditions required to continue his work.

May God help His Church. One can never dismiss, as humanly hard as it may seem, the possibility of a conversion… and, nonetheless, the future terrifies us.”

___________________

This was written 7 years ago and only speaks of his previous history!!!

How much more can we add today and how true to form  this picture is! How on earth, we may ask, could he slip through and even be considered a candidate for election with this history?  Don’t the bishops do their homework? Perhaps the good bishops were outnumbered – a distinct possibility.  But if they did know what to expect and they were outnumbered, why don’t they speak up now? Only a few speak out- very occasionally, I might add.

Why don’t they shout it from the rooftops? (as Bro. Alexis Bugnolo does in his posts.)

Jesus tells us what they should be doing in Matthew 10:

“Courage Under Persecution. 26  “Therefore do not be afraid of them. Nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, nor secret that will not be known.  27 What I say to you in the darkness, speak in the light; what you hear whispered, proclaim on the housetops. 28 And do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna .29 Are not two sparrows sold for a small coin? Yet not one of them falls to the ground without your Father’s knowledge. 30 Even all the hairs of your head are counted. 31 So do not be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows. before my heavenly Father. 33 But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father.

Previous to this advice, Jesus warned us of these times:

“Coming Persecutions. 16 Behold, I am sending you like sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and simple as doves. 17 But beware of people, for they will hand you over to courts and scourge you in their synagogues,18 and you will be led before governors and kings for my sake as a witness before them and the pagans. 19 When they hand you over, do not worry about how you are to speak or what you are to say. You will be given at that moment what you are to say. 20 For it will not be you who speak but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you. 21 Brother will hand over brother to death, and the father his child; children will rise up against parents and have them put to death. 22 You will be hated by all because of my name, but whoever endures to the end will be saved. 23 When they persecute you in one town, flee to another.Amen, I say to you, you will not finish the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes. 24 No disciple is above his teacher, no slave above his master. 2It is enough for the disciple that he become like his teacher, for the slave that he become like his master. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul,* how much more those of his household!”

Food for thought.

We have to do our bit – shout it from the rooftops. Perhaps if there is a loud enough outcry, we may have some impact – at least to recognize who the true pope is! This is the first step. And God knows that Pope Benedict need our prayers and our whole-hearted support.

 

Don’t be fooled! (Querida Amazonia) Part 1

AM+DG

I was surprised that so many people after reading the recent apostolic exhortation “Querida Amazonia”, say things like n- “Well that was lucky, we dodged a bullet”. Really? These are good Catholics who are aware of, and disturbed by, the goings-on in the church. How could they be so naive? A leopard doesn’t change his spots. We have had 7 years of his antics, why would he change now? The pretend pope is cunning.

The truth is that Pope Benedict and Cardinal Sarah knocked him out of his comfort zone. They decided to write a book about celibacy, it seems right after the “Instrumentem Laboris” was published last year. They were one step ahead. They knew what was coming.

It was kept secret and then released just before the pretend pope could announce his apostolic exhortation of the Amazonian Synod. It seems he was very angry! But why would he be angry if he wasn’t intending to change the rule about celibacy? It seems Gänswein didn’t do his job properly as a spy, between the households of the Pope and the pretend pope, and as a result suffered the brunt of the pretend pope’s anger.

So when the pretend pope didn’t explicitly mention “celibacy” and “women deacons”, the blind faithful reacted with joy. But they missed the point, he was just very cunning about it.

Read the document here: http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20200202_querida-amazonia.html

“POST-SYNODAL APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION

QUERIDA AMAZONIA

OF THE HOLY FATHER
FRANCIS

TO THE PEOPLE OF GOD
AND TO ALL PERSONS OF GOOD WILL”

Let’s just examine a few excerpts as an example:

  1. During the Synod, I listened to the presentations and read with interest the reports of the discussion groups. In this Exhortation, I wish to offer my own response to this process of dialogue and discernment. I will not go into all of the issues treated at length in the final document. Nor do I claim to replace that text or to duplicate it. I wish merely to propose a brief framework for reflection that can apply concretely to the life of the Amazon region a synthesis of some of the larger concerns that I have expressed in earlier documents, and that can help guide us to a harmonious, creative and fruitful reception of the entire synodal process.”

* What this means:
The whole synod document is a footnote to this apostolic exhortation,
and the pretend pope (pp or FP as in False Prophet)  has not closed the door on women priests or married priests.

  1. “In the Eucharist, God, “in the culmination of the mystery of the Incarnation, chose to reach our intimate depths through a fragment of matter”. The Eucharist “joins heaven and earth; it embraces and penetrates all creation”.[116] For this reason, it can be a “motivation for our concerns for the environment, directing us to be stewards of all creation”.[117] In this sense, “encountering God does not mean fleeing from this world or turning our back on nature”.[118] It means that we can take up into the liturgy many elements proper to the experience of indigenous peoples in their contact with nature, and respect native forms of expression in song, dance, rituals, gestures and symbols. The Second Vatican Council called for this effort to inculturate the liturgy among indigenous peoples;[119] over fifty years have passed and we still have far to go along these lines.[120]”

* What this means:
The first commandment is abolished and paganism is now officially incorporated into the Mass

  1. At the same time, I would like to officially present the Final Document, which sets forth the conclusions of the Synod, which profited from the participation of many people who know better than myself or the Roman Curia the problems and issues of the Amazon region, since they live there, they experience its suffering and they love it passionately. I have preferred not to cite the Final Document in this Exhortation, because I would encourage everyone to read it in full.”

**That means he is supporting everything entailed and described and recommended in the final Document of the Synod. He is just not going to mention it in the exhortation. Instead he wants everyone to read it and study it in full. In other words, all of it is so important, that he wants us all to study it in its entirety.

  1. Everything that the Church has to offer must become incarnate in a distinctive way in each part of the world, so that the Bride of Christ can take on a variety of faces that better manifest the inexhaustible riches of God’s grace. Preaching must become incarnate, spirituality must become incarnate, ecclesial structures must become incarnate. For this reason, I humbly propose in this brief Exhortation to speak of four great dreams that the Amazon region inspires in me.”

** This means the Church will no longer be “One, holy, catholic and Apostolic. The church will be different all over the world. Preaching and spirituality will become ‘incarnate’ i.e. reflecting each separate culture – paganism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism  you name it. The real Incarnation of God made man and the preaching of it will become extinct.

  1. I dream of an Amazon region that fights for the rights of the poor, the original peoples and the least of our brothers and sisters, where their voices can be heard and their dignity advanced.

I dream of an Amazon region that can preserve its distinctive cultural riches, where the beauty of our humanity shines forth in so many varied ways.

I dream of an Amazon region that can jealously preserve its overwhelming natural beauty and the superabundant life teeming in its rivers and forests.

I dream of Christian communities capable of generous commitment, incarnate in the Amazon region, and giving the Church new faces with Amazonian features.”
 

**I dream too – of a Church where Christ’s voice can be heardwhere people everywhere can recognize Christ’s teaching; where the beauty of our Faith, founded by Jesus Christ, the Son of God shines forth. Christian communities who are ‘incarnate in the Amazon region which give the Church new faces with Amazonian features’ – is my worst nightmare!

  “CHAPTER ONE
A SOCIAL DREAM”

“CHAPTER TWO
A CULTURAL DREAM”

“CHAPTER THREE
AN ECOLOGICAL DREAM”

The titles of the chapters say it all – it is communism, Marxism, – in fact it is the “new humanism” which the pretend pope(FP) told us about last year. Read paragraphs 8-27 in the Vatican Exhortation. See link above.

“CHAPTER FOURTH
AN ECCLESIAL DREAM”

“journey alongside(Where have we heard that before?)

  1. “As she perseveres in the preaching of the kerygma, the Church also needs to grow in the Amazon region. In doing so, she constantly reshapes her identity through listening and dialogue with the people, the realities and the history of the lands in which she finds herself. In this way, she is able to engage increasingly in a necessary process of inculturation that rejects nothing of the goodness that already exists in Amazonian cultures, but brings it to fulfilment in the light of the Gospel.[84] Nor does she scorn the richness of Christian wisdom handed down through the centuries, presuming to ignore the history in which God has worked in many ways. For the Church has a varied face, “not only in terms of space… but also of time”.[85] Here we see the authentic Tradition of the Church, which is not a static deposit or a museum piece, but the root of a constantly growing tree.[86] This millennial Tradition bears witness to God’s work in the midst of his people and “is called to keep the flame alive rather than to guard its ashes”.[87]

** Really? The church constantly reshapes her identity…? a museum piece?  “keep the flame alive – ? which flame? The only flame I see is paganism, which the pretend pope wants to intertwine with Christ’s Church. And he refers to longstanding unchanged Tradition as ashes!

“The inculturation of the liturgy

81. The inculturation of Christian spirituality in the cultures of the original peoples can benefit in a particular way from the sacraments, since they unite the divine and the cosmic, grace and creation. In the Amazon region, the sacraments should not be viewed in discontinuity with creation. They “are a privileged way in which nature is taken up by God to become a means of mediating supernatural life.[114] They are the fulfillment of creation, in which nature is elevated to become a locus and instrument of grace, enabling us “to embrace the world on a different plane”.[115]

** Well, that’s the weirdest description of liturgy and the Sacraments I have ever heard! “nature is taken up to God”,… “fulfillment of Creation”…(nature) “mediating supernatural life”. Actually, the pretend pope is saying that nature is a god and  “is elevated to become a locus and instrument of grace”.  

Well, that is just a little taste.  I don’t want to read any more. You get the drift. We can’t trust the pretend pope. We should know that by now. He is the “False Prophet” of Revelation. He is the one preparing for, and paving the way for the Antichrist. All his actions point to it.

He is destroying the Church and making way for a church of darkness.

It’s all in the prophecies.

 

The FP/PF and his “New Humanism”: Prophecies spell it out in detail

AM+DGFP/PF announcd a “global event” in May to discuss a “new humanism”.

He actually mentioned this last year. I guess the “New evangelisation” probably goes hand in hand with this. (but I’m sure he’s saving this for later.) If you missed our posts last year on Pope Francis, Humanism, its links and what it means, see:

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2019/09/24/connecting-the-dots-part-1-the-new-humanism-and-pope-frances/

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2019/09/26/connecting-the-dots-part-2-humanism-and-its-links/ 

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2019/09/28/connecting-the-dots-part-4-the-new-humanism-errors-and-prophecy/

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2019/09/22/new-humanism-our-lady-of-la-salette-st-francis-of-assisi/

On his announcement on the event to be held in May, one of Tony M’s friends (David) commented on the FP and his announcement of the “New Humanism”. Our articles (see links above)  also connected this to messages in the Book of Truth. Everything connected with the End Times is in this book and Jesus tells us what to expect. David has compiled a very extensive list of quotes, some of which I have dealt with in our previous posts (see links above). Take David’s advice and read then all in full.

You can access these messages at: https://missionofsalvation.com/  (and a few other places). Just go to the site, then “messages” and search for the date. The messages are all in chronological order.

David’s  says:

 “You have all no doubt heard of the meeting the FP Bergoglio has called for in Rome this coming May.  May 14, 2020 to be exact. His call to establish a “new humanism” surprises some, goes right over the heads of others, but does not surprise in the least those of us who are blessed to have studied the messages in the Book of Truth.  

 In his rambling 500 word announcement (in which there was not a single mention of Jesus or God), Bergoglio said “We need a global compact on education aimed at developing a new universal solidarity and a new humanism. So, I wish to endorse a global event to take place on May 14, 2020.”  If you have not read this announcement, you should to have additional context.

 Occasionally, something Bergoglio says prompts me, as it might you, to look to see what the Book of Truth says about it. I did so in the case of this announcement, using the word “humanism.” Not surprisingly, there are 14 Book of Truth messages which include this word.  As with any of the Book of Truth messages, it is nearly impossible to take any single part, out of context of the entire message, but nevertheless I have done so below. To the surprise of none of us, the messages we see in the Book of Truth stands in stark contrast to what Bergoglio is calling for, as proven in these excerpts:

Excerpts of messages on “Humanism”

December 25, 2014:  Jesus:  Humanism is an affront to God because it focuses on man’s needs and not the need to repent of sin before the Creator of all that is.

August 8, 2014:  Mother of Salvation: Humanism will become the substitute for Christianity where no mention of God will be uttered

June 27, 2014:  Jesus: My Church, when it divides and falls, will embrace humanism with great relish

July 27, 2013:  Jesus: Look behind the mask of humanism and you will not find signs of God…Be careful when you embrace humanism, because when you do, you cut yourselves off from Me.

March 4, 2015: Jesus: Confusion does not come from Me. My Word is clear, My Teachings infinite. Humanity has embraced humanism and atheism as a substitute for Me.

June 30, 2014: Jesus: You will betray Me; deny Me and embrace My enemies, for you will be so caught up in the new religion – the secular humanism, which will come as a wolf dressed in sheep’s clothing to devour you – that I will be forgotten.

June 28, 2014: Mother of Salvation: Many new rules will be introduced into my Son’s Church on Earth, as thousands of newcomers will be sworn into the Church and they will not be authentic, for they will not have the True Spirit of Christ within their hearts. They will enter the Church and will bear witness to a new one world religion, which will not honour my Son, Jesus Christ. Not only will they not serve Him, their duty will be to serve the needs of humanism, which will, at its very core, deny the Existence of the Supernatural State of God and all that He stands for.

June 6, 2014: Mother of Salvation: (regarding the “new book” to be published) It will be everything that is the opposite to the True Word of God. It will be a book, which sets out to evangelise the world into believing in the importance of humanism.

April 18, 2014: Jesus: My Crosses will begin to disappear and while My Churches, and those who say they serve Me, talk about the importance of humanism, you will not hear talk of the importance of surrendering to Me, Jesus Christ, your Saviour.

December 10, 2013: Jesus: …how it pains Me to see so many people accept the false humility, which lies behind the humanism, which is so favoured by those in My Church. When did you, who call yourselves servants of God, decide to replace the True Word of God with your own flawed interpretation of it? When did you decide to replace Christianity with humanism, where no mention is made of Me? “(David’s note: In Bergoglio’s announcement he made NO MENTION of Jesus.)

November 9, 2013: Jesus: They will use the message of humanism, love of one another, in terms of your ability to look after the poor, uneducated and needy, as a substitute for the Truth you were given in the Gospels.

June 3, 2013: Jesus: Most importantly, it (Paganism) will be presented as being harmless fun for those who dabble in new age practices and as being an important part of personal development – a form of humanism and love of self.

May 19, 2013: Jesus: It will be presented to the world as a new form of social justice – a new form of humanism, when all the needs of man are catered for. These needs will include the right to sin, but these sins will, in defiance of God, be seen to be the moral rights of man.

March 29, 2013: Jesus: Showing concern for the needs of fellow human beings is admirable.  But when you promote the physical well-being of the needs of man over their spiritual needs it is not I, Jesus Christ, you follow. Humanism is not Christianity.

I strongly recommend reading the above messages in their entirety. Especially in the lead-up to this meeting in Rome on May 14. Also, I recommend reading Bergoglio’s entire 500-word announcement. This will certainly be a difficult moment for the Church, especially in the wake of what is expected in the final document on the Amazonian “synod” which should be out within the next couple of weeks.  

God bless,

David.”

See:  Pope Francis invites religious, political leaders to sign ‘Global Pact’ for ‘new humanism’ at:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-global-education-pact

 

 

Anniversary of Pope Benedict’s “Declaration” of 11th Feb. 2013

AM+DG

Today, 11th February is the anniversary of when Pope Benedict was “ousted” from office.

It is also the feastday of our Lady of Lourdes! Let us all commend him to our Blessed Mother today and every day!

Bro. Alexis Bugnolo (FROM ROME site) announced yesterday, that

from 11:30 to 11:58 A.M., for the 7th Anniversary of the reading by Pope Benedict of his Declaratio of Feb. 11, 2013, the Committee “Grex Vocum” — Latin for, A Flock of Voices — has called on Catholics to come to the Piazza at the Vatican, in front of Saint Peter’s Basilica and express for 28 minutes, out loud, their disapproval of the course taken by Church leadership in the last 7 years.”

See the article at: https://fromrome.info/2020/02/10/grex-vocum-tomorrow-feb-11-piazza-san-pietro-vatican/

The event will be videoed. It will occur at 11 A.M. Rome time, which is 5 A.M. New York City Time, and 9 P.M. Sydney time. Go to the video page for the brief reports which will be uploaded as filmed.

FromRome.Info will publish a complete report about 4 hours later.

Please try to tune in, and support this event whichever way you can.
If you live on the other side of the world from Rome, support it in spirit.

Corona Virus: What is the real agenda?

AM+DG

Previous Posts:

On 1st Feb, 2020 and 2nd Feb., we posted articles on the Corona virus and its connection with prophecy and the end times. We focussed on whether this would be the cause or the precursor of the “global vaccination”  as foretold in the Book of Truth.

Read the previous articles here:

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2020/02/01/the-corona-virus-evil-endgame-part1/

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2020/02/02/corona-virus-evil-endgame-part-2/  posted Feb. 2

 FP/PF and the UN’s Sustainable Goals:

We know that Pope Francis signed the 28 Sustainable Goals of the UN. These “goals are strategies with which to ensure that the earth continues to “sustain” us- that we do not deplete the earth of it’s resources. To people of Faith, we know that this could never be – We have a loving God who created the earth to sustain the creatures He also created.

We know that this agenda is one of control of the world by the elite:  creating a “one-world government” and a “one-world religion”. The Alta Vendita attested to this (back in the 1800’s )- they were just waiting for a pope to be elected “according to their needs”. Their enemy is the Catholic Church. The demolition of the church, the removal of its true Shepherd has begun in earnest. “Amoris Laetitia” has affected the Sacraments of Marriage, Penance and even Holy Orders. “Laudato Si” has been the vehicle by which paganism was introduced into the Church and by which Holy Orders will be further destroyed (married priests and perhaps even women priests). This pope’s goals are communistic – he himself boasted of a “new humanism” and a “new evangelisation”. We are awaiting what the “new Mass” (which they have been planning for a while now) will be like. Will it be the “abomination of desolation” which Daniel the prophet spoke of?

His other encyclicals have also provided the groundwork for his plans to be easily put into place.

UN Sustainable Goal – Depopulation

One of the 28 Sustainable Goals, which PF/FP signed is for depopulation supporting policies of contraception, abortion, euthanasia. At any other time in History, everyone would be up in arms against a pope who supported such diabolical goals against God’s people. These laws are already in place in governments around the world. Recognition of divorce and remarriage by the Church, and recognition of same-sex couples as well as all the other “rights” such as transgenderism, has destroyed the family as the centre of society. It will be an easy thing to combine as one, the “new one-world government” and the “new one-world religion.” After all, we have a pope who immerses himself in politics.

Now, besides the laws listed above, how else do you get rid of a large proportion of the world’s population?

How about disease? In our previous articles on the Coronavirus, we mentioned a “Bio-lab” located in Wuhan. What a co-incidence that the virus started here.

New information:

We wrote previously about the “bio lab” located in Wuhan, China. There has also been evidence that the Coronavirus was man-made. Really? Well it wouldn’t be the first time.  An eminent scientist, who, according to his credentials knows what he is talking about, has claimed that it is a “bioweapon” and that the UN knows about it. The article (see https://www.zerohedge.com/health/creator-bioweapons-act-says-coronavirus-biological-warfare-weapon ) states:

The Wuhan BSL-4 lab is also a specially designated World Health Organization (WHO) research  lab and Dr. Boyle contends that the WHO knows full well what is occurring.”

Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act has given a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about it.”

(Read the whole article with Dr Boyle’s claims, studies and other investigations at the link mentioned.)

Now, you might say that a vaccine will help. But it usually takes years to develop a vaccine – right? Well I guess we will see. In our last article, we shared information that a vaccine had actually been patented back in 2015. This scientist states that it is a “bio-weapon”. If this is true, it would be compatible with the UN’s 28 Sustainable Goals agenda. Perhaps it is and perhaps it isn’t. Perhaps the vaccine will be worse.

Prophecy:

In the Book of Truth, Jesus tells us of a “world-wide vaccination” that will kill us. Will this Coronavirus instil so much fear into people that they will eagerly accept a vaccine? A vaccine that will create disease”?

“My dearly beloved daughter the plans of the Masonic groups to take over the world currencies are getting close to completion. Their wicked plans also include a new global vaccination which will create disease all over the world to cause suffering on a scale never seen before. Avoid any such sudden global vaccination announced for it will kill you. –( June 17th, 2012 ) https://missionofsalvation.com/Message-0461/

“They will introduce a form of genocide, through compulsory vaccinations, against your children with or without your permission. This vaccination will be a poison and will be presented under a global healthcare plan”. (9 Nov. 2012: https://missionofsalvation.com/Message-0608/

 As you can see in the prophecies above, Jesus warns us against the vaccine– rather than the disease!

Precedent for general vaccination

There is a precedent about forcing people to vaccinate. Jesus tells us in the Book of Truth that we have allowed our governments to make the laws which in the end,  will be used against us.  A measles epidemic began about Oct. 2019 and was raging in December in a number of Pacific Islands. They blamed the epidemic on the large number of unvaccinated children.

One of the islands was Samoa.The Ministry of Health in each affected country is coordinating response efforts with support from WHO and partners. “On 20 November 2019, Samoan authorities launched a mass vaccination campaign ...” People were forbidden to leave their houses, while Medical workers came round to each house to vaccinate everyone in the house. The epidemic was blamed on “antivaccers”. Social media (posted on 28 Dec. 2019) tells us that:

“In Samoa, a mandatory mass vaccination campaign is happening right now with the order not to publicly question vaccine safety and one activist was arrested for giving vitamins A & C to children.

Perhaps it was a test case. Notice the WHO was involved.  It was forced vaccination.

All of us (older people) lived through a time when all children got measles, and chicken pox and mumps. They were just “childhood illnesses.”. They were never considered life-threatening. They were not nice diseases, but parents didn’t fear, because it was normal.

Another side-effect:

It’s interesting how both the secular and religious world are so intertwined right now.  The Pope has signed a UN declaration of “Sustainable goals”. The secular world institutes laws against ‘discrimination’ – the Church recognizes divorce, homosexual couples are blessed and pagan rituals are inserted into catholic ceremonies, rituals and Sacraments-even the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass!!

Well now we have an outbreak of a “new” strain of coronavirus that is spreading rapidly. The Bishop of our diocese has ordered that there be no sign of Peace, and no Communion under both kinds the Precious Blood is only for the priest. (Although, personally, I must admit that the latter two are as it should be.) It also seems that most parishes have taken away the holy water, which is an important Sacramental. As well as this, many priests are also refusing to give Communion on the tongue.

Our rights are being abrogated fast. The threat in Australia is not yet big, and is contained, but the fear grows out of proportion. Sadly, this is another attack on the Eucharist. The evil one is clever and cunning!

See the following articles:

Catholics scrap Mass rituals over virus fears”  (Daily Telegraph)
and the “Catholic Outlook” for Diocese of Parramatta:

“… , and after consulting Bishop Vincent the following directives apply in the celebration of Mass in the Diocese of Parramatta from 1 February 2020.

        • In those parishes and communities in the Diocese of Parramatta where Holy Communion is distributed in Both Kinds, this practice will cease. Communion of the Precious Blood will be for the celebrant only.
        • For the time being priests/deacons are not to invite parishioners to exchange the Greeting of Peace.
        • All ministers of Holy Communion (both Ordinary and Extraordinary) are to use hand sanitisers before the distribution of Holy Communion commences.…”  

https://catholicoutlook.org/diocese-of-parramatta-update-on-the-coronavirus/

The Church is under attack in more ways than one!

What does all this mean?

It will all be labelled “conspiracy theory” and some of this might well be.

But it would be at our peril that we ignore the potential danger presented by “global vaccination” or “compulsory vaccination”, in the light of these prophecies.

Today, the world is not as it is portrayed.

The main stream Media and world governments are no longer transparent or dependable.

Many of our Church leaders have betrayed us.

All I am saying is we have to pray for discernment and protection!

We have to watch, listen and be attentive.

Don’t be caught unawares.

We have been warned!