Scandalizing the Faithful: Truth or Fiction? A Crusader’s Perspective

AM+DG

Of course we all know how Bergoglio works by now, but we can’t always convince others who still question who is the villain – Scalfari or Bergoglio? The following arguments (from TM) may be useful to reflect upon, in the case of: 

“Did he deny the divinity of Christ?”

Tony writes…

“So many commentators who, after a ponderously long number of years have finally woken up to the heretical antics of JM Bergoglio, still seem to remain uncertain as to whether he ‘really said’ what his favourite journalist quoted him as saying regarding Christ’s not being Divine whilst He was on earth. 

Michael Voris, in a youtube chat with Dr Taylor Marshall said that the most disturbing news to emerge during the Amazon Synod was of Eugenio Scalfari referring to Bergoglio as having said that:

Anyone who has had the good fortune to meet with him and speak with him in utmost confidence – as I have done several times – knows that Pope Francis conceives of Christ as Jesus of Nazareth: a man, not an incarnate god. Once incarnate, Jesus ceases to be a god and becomes a man, until his death on the cross.”

Did he say it???? Did he not say it???? Did he say it???? Did he not say it????

So many commentators have been asking these questions after the latest clanger.

They obviously still have not gotten their heads around this and are still giving Bergoglio the benefit of the doubt- AMAZING!!!

This latest one really, really needs to be fully addressed and dealt with. It is urgent that it is addressed. Catholics are being hereticised by this & losing their Catholic beliefs.

It is a scandal that a man who sits on the Chair of Peter denies Christ’s Divinity- to the world! Image result for put it under a microscope

Let’s get our teeth into this and put it under the microscope.

Why did Bergoglio not come out and immediately deny that he had conveyed this to Scalfari???

Answer:  Because he had planned with Scalfari for him to report this to the world……and during this outrageous and idol- worshipping Pan-Amazonian Synod…. the timing of the release precisely planned.

They are very good mates…. remember.…….The supposed Pope & the famous atheist.

With all the babble that comes from the mouth & pen of Bergoglio about everything under the sun….. except spiritual matters like ‘to pray for the salvation of souls’….. why does he not deny what Scalfari reported about his saying that Jesus was not Divine whilst on earth?

Bergoglio came out immediately and forcefully after the Pachamamas were thrown into the Tiber to state As a bishop of the diocese, I ask forgiveness from the persons who were offended by this,he said.

He has not apologized to the Catholics & Christians of the world for the fact that these pagan icons were on Vatican soil in the first place, much less bowed down to and worshipped there. No, no, no!!

Nor has he apologized for the ‘misunderstanding’ involved in Scalfari’s report re: Jesus not being Divine whilst on earthNo, no, no!!

I repeat…..why did he not come out immediately and forcefully to refute what Scalfari had reported him saying about Jesus’ Divinity??????????

If you (the reader of this email) had a big public role…… Pope, President or Prime Minister….. and you periodically sat down with a now world famous journalist to convey your thoughts to the world…..and this journalist time & time again misquoted what you had said on very serious matters that affected the whole planet and the salvation of souls….would you keep going back to that journo to have him misquote what you said? Speaking for myselfNO WAY, JOSE!!!!!!!

So why does he keep going back to Scalfari??

ANSWER: Because he wants Scalfari to spew out his heresies…but done in a way that he can’t be nailed for it.…done in such a way that absurdly incredulous commentators keep saying to themselves ….did he say this…did he not say this…..did he say this ….did he not say this…..ad infinitum!!!

Bergoglio has these naïve & gullible commentators all sewn up. He would be laughing at their incredulity. And so would the atheist, Scalfari!!!

This is a pre-planned method of Bergoglio delivering appalling heresies to the world…and not just to the people of Italy….. as one reporter from 1Peter5 attempted to ingenuously rationalize.

When Bergoglio speaks, every word goes out to the world and he knows itno matter what the primary outlet… Italian or Swahili!!!

So here we have Bergoglio going back to the one who reported him as saying ‘no-one goes to Hell, but if not deserving of Heaven will be annihilated’ … to report him saying that ‘Jesus was not Divine whilst on Earth’.

It would take only a few words for Bergoglio to deny this. He says so many,  many things….so why can’t he issue a denial? If he did not make this assertion, it is imperative that he makes a public denial that he said this, and does it immediately.

This is a scandal that could take millions away from a belief in Christ’s Divinity.

If it is true Bergoglio said this…. it is a heresy of the HIGHEST order.
The Catholics of the world should be screaming out for him to personally deny that he made this statement…

But we know that he will not do that.
And we know that, in time, he will be back for another interview with Scalfari. After a number of interviews with his favourite interviewer…. we know how it all works now.

I am now saying emphatically that I BELIEVE that:

BERGOLIO HAS SAID JESUS WAS NOT DIVINE WHEN HE WALKED THE EARTH….and I cannot be blamed for believing he said that!!!

Bergoglio is the one to be blamed for ‘my believing’ he said that!!!

He said that!!! If he did make the assertion that Jesus was not Divine whilst on earth, it is not possible that Bergoglio is the Pope!!! 

And because of all the other heresies he has announced to the world from the Chair of Peter, it is not possible that he is the Pope!!!

 Of course many of you are aware….. there are other reasons too; relating to the process of the St Gallen Mafia Club planning and manufacturing his election ……for believing that he is not the Pope.

My purpose in writing this is one reason only….the defense of the true and immutable teachings of our beloved Catholic Church, our only hope of salvation. And, if in the process of doing that, I put a spotlight on the nefarious agenda of the man supposedly on the Chair of Peter….so be it!!!

God help us ….please help us!

God bless,

Tony.

PF/FP – Destructuring the Structure – Part 1

AM+DG

Bergoglio’s chosen name and the prophecies:

It is interesting that PF/FP chose the name ‘Francis’. St. Francis himself was asked by Our Lord to “rebuild His Church.” It seems that his choice of name was very cunning, deliberate and deceptive.

St Francis prophesied:

“ At the time of this tribulation a man, not (authentically) canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his cunning, will endeavor to draw many into error… There will be such diversity of opinions and schisms among the people… for in those days Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor, but a destroyer”.

PF/FP is the destroyer mentioned by St Francis of Assisi. He is destroying Doctrine, and the governing structure of the Church. He is also building a new false church, and drawing many into error.

Our Lady to Fr. Gobbi:

 “…This Masonic infiltration, in the interior of the Church, was already foretold to you by me at Fatima, when I announced to you that Satan would enter in even to the summit of the Church. The task of ecclesiastical Masonry is that of destroying Christ and His Church, building a new idol, namely a false christ and a false church.”

There is much evidence that he is a Mason or at least has masonic ties. It is evident that Francis is building a false Christ and a false church.

 Evidence of the destruction of Christ’s Church and the restructure for the new church can be readily recognized in the evidence that follows.

 Our Lady of La Salette prophesied about the latter times:

“Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the antichrist… all the universe will be struck with terror, and many will let themselves be misled. …  

The Church will be eclipsed…  Melanie (the visionary) stated that Our Lady said the Church will be “eclipsed” in this two-fold sense: 1) “that one will not know which is the true Pope

Our Lady of Akita:

“The Church will be full of those who accept compromises”

From the very beginning PF/FP was intent on change.

It was reported on July 8, that during a sermon Francis gave during morning Mass at the Casa Santa Marta on Saturday, in which he said:  “In the Christian life, even in the life of the Church, there are old structures, passing structures: it is necessary to renew them!” Vatican Radio quoted Francis as saying in the Mass.

He also said: “”Don’t be afraid of that! Don’t be afraid of the newness of the Gospel! Don’t be afraid of the newness that the Holy Spirit works in us! Don’t be afraid of the renewal of structures!”

From:  https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/francis-chronicles/pope-francis-and-church-changes

On the first day after his election, he said at 4.37pm: “After these days of grace, I hope we will have the courage to walk in the presence of the Lord, with the cross of the Lord, and rebuild his church, the pope says, ending his homily.”

…Archbishop Timothy Dolan (speaking about Francis’ election): ‘He toasted us and he simply said, ‘May God forgive you,’ which brought the house down. In other words, ‘I hope you don’t regret this later’.’

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/14/pope-francis-first-day

The style of Francis

  • In an article on Lifesite news on 12th June, 2019, Martin Mosebach stated that under Pope Francis, the Catholic Church “has assumed the character of the western Liberalism of North American Democrats and of the German Green Party,” thus presenting herself as being “anti-sacramental, anti-hierarchical, committed to the ultra-liberal claims of societal diversity.”
  • He described Pope Francis’s style of government as “paradoxical and said that Francis “is a ruler who demands submission and blind obedience in order to destroy, especially by this means, the spiritual foundation of all obedience.” In the German author’s eyes, Francis uses “the papal authority in order to undermine the papal Magisterium. It becomes more and more clear that he understands himself as an agent of a revolution from the top down.”
  • In Easter Week of 2019, 19 Catholic scholars wrote an open letter to the bishops of the church, accusing Pope Francis of “the Canonical Delict of Heresy” (https://onepeterfive.com/catholic-scholars-accuse-pope-francis-of-the-canonical-delict-of-heresy/ ).

Their evidence was organized in 3 sections:

 “Pope Francis’s public statements contradicting truths of the faith.” 

 “Pope Francis’s public actions that indicate a rejection of truths of the faith.” …A large number of Pope Francis’s public actions have manifested his belief in the heresies listed ..’. Examples of appointments or defenses of problematic clerics, promotion of anti-Catholic public figures, the failure to answer the dubia, and other actions taken that signify, …a departure from authentic Catholic life and thought.

 “Pope Francis’s pertinacity in adhering to heretical propositions, despite evidence of his theological credentials and his work drawing citations from the very documents he is otherwise alleged to contradict. The authors assert, that he is “well informed enough on Catholic doctrine to know that the heresies he is professing are contrary to Catholic doctrine.

His use of language

(The information below are excerpts from an article on httpp://thesensiblebond.blogspot.co.uk/ but the link no longer seems to be there. The article was entitled  The Sensible Bond  Friday, 27 September 2013  and was referring to an interview of Pope Francis.)

“…language is also war. It’s the stuff of propaganda. It’s the stuff of rousing pre-battle speeches and of post-battle excuses. It’s the handiwork of spies and the tool of diplomats. Yes, language is war in every possible way.

“St Francis of Assisi has always been popular even with people who instinctively loathe Catholicism, so placing his papacy under that sign was, from a PR perspective, shrewder than shrewd – or, to use an old favourite, ‘more cunning than a fox who has just been appointed Professor of Cunning at Oxford University.’

Language of mercyfor that is how it has been justified – has led to colossal misunderstandings. But really, if you’re the Vicar of Christ, would you rather be hated because you told the truth (albeit kindly), or loved because someone thought you were changing the truth?

Language of latitudeHis language aims of course at toning down dogmatism; It creates false images through half lies and distortions.

Language of Omissionshis omissions are crucial to a true understanding of the topic and are deeply connotative.

The fig leaf of orthodoxyThinking with the non-hierarchical Church (as Pope Francis describes it) is no more than a matter of counsel, since I need not share the theology of any one school; thinking with the hierarchical Church, on the other hand, is a matter of precept. Reading Francis, you would think these two are of equal importance. But counsel is not precept and precept is not counsel. The confusion of the two is hugely dangerous.

The language of dynamicIn a particular interview (being discussed in the article, the word “dynamic” is mentioned at least four times: Vatican II was a new “dynamic” of reading the Gospel; reform requires “new historical dynamics”; God enters the “dynamic” of human relationships; the Synod of Bishops is not “dynamic”. (Dynamic means: “continuously changing or developing”)

He consistently criticizes faithful Catholics :

  • He has called young people who attend the traditional Mass ‘rigid’.
  • He has used expressions such as ‘breeding like rabbits’, ‘rosary counters’
  • He has accused Christians of ’cowardliness’ who zealously follow the Ten Commandments
  • He has consistently used coarse and degrading language to criticize and vilify those with whom he disagrees.

PF mixes Politics with Religion:

The best example is his encyclical Laudato Si – on the environment and global warming. This encyclical has nothing to do with doctrine or Church teaching. “sins against the environment” are mentioned. Is this paganism? We sin against God, not the environment!

He also promoted this political concept at a speech before the U.N.

In fact, it has just been announced that September this year will be celebrating the “Season of Creation” to limit global warming.

See  https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-joins-orthodox-protestants-to-proclaim-environmentalist-season-of-creation

It is very misleading to call it ‘Season of creation’. Season has connotations of Church Seasons – which are Advent, Christmas, Epiphany,Lent,Easter, Pentecost. The reason  for the awareness of ‘global warming” is political. Because it has been announced by the Vatican, people will think that this is somehow mandatory. It is enforcing the viewpoint that the pope has authority over political issues as well as religious ones – a viewpoint that he has been widening.

This political/religious mix can be seen in the ‘Instrumentum Laboris’ which has just been announced for the pan Amazonian synod in October.

 

‘Pope’ (mis)quotes Jesus Christ in order to justify the desecration of the Holy Eucharist

Unbelievable news today people. ‘Pope’ Francis this morning misquoted Jesus Christ in the Santa-Marta-chapel in Rome in order to defile the Holy Eucharist. Jorge Bergoglio stated that Jesus Christ Himself would have admitted adulterers to the Blessed Sacrament.

Read the full story here:  ‘Pope’ (mis)quotes Jesus Christ in order to justify the desecration of the Holy Eucharist