Tag: manipulation

“The greatest hold that Satan has over them is to convince them that God is evil.”

AM+DG

My Tears will have ceased by then, but My Sadness will be never ending

12 March 2014 @ 9:08pm; Message 1072

My dearly beloved daughter, when a man separates from Me, I follow him to the ends of the Earth to draw him back to Me. He may insult Me, commit terrible atrocities and go as far as to idolize everything evil, including making himself a slave of the devil, but I will never give up. 

I will intervene in his life in many ways. I will introduce real love into his life; I will open his heart to love for other people; I will tug at his conscience; I will allow him to suffer at the hands of others – only to make him humble and, therefore more open to Me, Jesus Christ. I will let him see the simplicity of the world in all its glorious beauty, as created by My Father, to entice him away from falsities, which blight his life. I will, through little children, show him the importance of putting the needs of those who rely on him before his own. I will bring him laughter, show him great acts of kindness, through pure souls, and I will show him examples of his own weakness, so that he knows that he is not greater than God. I may allow him to become ill, if it will make him surrender to Me and, in such cases, then My Mercy will be at its greatest. For it is such souls who are most likely to turn to Me and then they will and can be saved by Me.

How much effort is made by Me, your beloved Jesus Christ, to take each of you into the safety of My Arms – My Refuge. And how many of you still turn the other way and ignore Me.

I intervene through messages, given to genuine seers and visionaries, and these have converted millions. I send signs; I pour Graces from Heaven; I bring you Gifts through the Holy Sacraments and millions have converted. Sadly, not enough have turned to Me and this is why I will not rest until every sign, every miracle, every Gift, every prophecy and every Intervention has been exhausted, before I come to judge.

It will be a sad day if those who refuse My Gifts and My Intervention have to stand before Me on the Great Day and still deny Me. Even then, when I give them the chance to put their pride to one side and come to Me, they will still refuse. By then, there will be nothing more that I can do to bring them Eternal Life, as they will not welcome it. You may wonder why this is the case and so I will explain.

When the devil tempts the soul, it takes some time before he gains a strong foothold within the person. But once he devours him, he dictates every move that person makes – how he thinks, how he communicates with people, how he sins and the kind of sin he wants that soul to indulge in. The greatest hold that Satan has over them is to convince them that God is evil. Satan will convince the soul that he is God and that God is, in fact, the evil one. That is how these souls will be destroyed through the devious cunning and manipulation of the devil. So dark will these souls become, that to stand in My Light will be excruciatingly painful for them and they will hide their faces from Me. My Tears will have ceased by then, but My Sadness will be never ending.

Your Jesus

Evil intent: Amoris Laetitia Part 2

+AMDG+

“So we won’t speak plainly, … then I will draw out the conclusions.”

(See previous post Evil intent: Amoris Laetitia Part 1)

Some examples of the evil intent of this papacy:

1.Explosive language pertaining to homosexualiy was allowed to be presented at the synod. These suggest ideas which oppose Church teachings: CCC: #2357; Gen.19 13: Story of Lot and city of Sodom; (Ezek. 16:50); (Lev. 18:22, 20:13); (Rom. 1:26–28, 32); and (1 Cor.6:9–10). 

2. Admission by (pope) Francis: Deliberately NOT speaking plainly regarding Communion for divorced and remarried.(See Evil intent: Amoris Laetitia Part1) Jerusalem Bible: Matthew5:37 “All you need to say is ‘Yes’ if you mean yes or ‘No’ if you mean no; anything more than this  comes from the evil one.”

 

3. Despite the final Synodal Relatio affirming that marriage is for one man and one woman, it inserted paragraphs that support homosexual unions.

4. Pope videos – pagan images projected onto the Vatican on the feastday of the Immaculate Conception; the ‘I believe in love, (no mention of God) – all religions are equal video- contrary to the teachings of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.

5. Washing the feet on Holy Thursday of women and Moslems, etc are a direct insult and put- down of the dignity and role of the priesthood. It denigrates the meaning and symbolism of the ceremony.

6. #Amoris Laetitia ¶3 Each country/region can seek solutions better suited to its culture/traditions/local needs  [aka protestant style federation of (40000+) churches, no central church magisteriurm, relativism] (TTcrusader                  

7. #AmorisLaetitia ¶301 “It can no longer simply be said that all those in any irregular situations are living in a state of mortal sin “ [ie adulterers (divorced/remarried), sodomites, fornicators are not in a state of mortal sin, sin does not exist, and the 6th commandment is washed away] (TTcrusader)

8. #AmorisLaetitia footnote #351 “In certain cases this can include the help of the sacraments” [ie adulterers (divorced/remarried), sodomites, fornicators may  receive holy communion] (TTcrusader)

9. #Amoris Laetitia uses half- quotes from Encyclicals to suit his own purposes. E.g. ‘ a statement from Familiaris Consortio of John Paul II which notes that that there can be situations “where, for serious reasons, such as the children’s upbringing, a man and woman cannot satisfy the obligation to separate.” The rest of the statement was deliberately omitted. “they ‘take on themselves the duty to live in complete continence, that is, by abstinence from the acts proper to married couples.” See : http://voiceofthefamily.com/key-doctrinal-errors-and-ambiguities-of-amoris-laetitia/ 

10. #Amoris Laetitia not only uses half-quotes but twists them by inserting footnotes: e.g. Amoris Laetitia has not only eliminated reference to “complete continence” from the quotation from John Paul II, but has actually inserted a footnote suggesting that “complete continence” might, in some cases, not in fact be possible or even desirable.See: http://voiceofthefamily.com/key-doctrinal-errors-and-ambiguities-of-amoris-laetitia/

11. Pope Francis uses words originally written about married couples and applying them to those living in adultery. E.g. Footnote, no. 329 originally from (Gaudium et Spes, No. 51). Instead of “But where the intimacy of married life is broken off, its faithfulness can sometimes be imperilled and its quality of fruitfulness ruined, for then the upbringing of the children and the courage to accept new ones are both endangered”(Gaudium et spes) he states “In such situations, many people, knowing and accepting the possibility of living ‘as brothers and sisters’ which the Church offers them, point out that if certain expressions of intimacy are lacking, ‘it often happens that faithfulness is endangered and the good of the children suffers’.”

See http://voiceofthefamily.com/key-doctrinal-errors-and-ambiguities-of-amoris-laetitia/

“…the Pope intentionally manipulated the synodal process — against the will of the Bishops –to get an outcome that he knew would not be otherwise acceptable.” 

See   http://www.onepeterfive.com/pope-speaking-plainly-communion-divorced-messy/

A Conspiracy?? Did I hear that right?

13th October, 2015

Cardinal Pell, after daring to voice the concerns of many bishops and cardinals about how everything has been weighted in favour of the progressives/ modernists/ liberals (whatever they want to call themselves) was, in effect, reprimanded by “the FP” and warned the synod fathers  against “conspiracy theories”.

Who is conspiring?

  • Why did the letter by the cardinals to “the FP” refer to the new synodal procedures as “lacking openness and genuine collegiality”?
  • Who sidelined Cardinal Erdo when he spoke up in defence of Church Doctrine – by ensuring he does not get the microphone, so he can’t lead the discussions in the manner he was meant to?
  • Who went ahead and issued Annulment reforms, before the synod had even made a conclusion – and without consulting the various groups of Vatican cardinal and bishops that usually manage these things?
  • Why were there secret meetings before the synod?
  • Who changed the rules of the synod – so that only the opening and closing address and the Relatio document of last year can be used?
  • Why was Cardinal Gerhard Műller (head of the Congregation of the Faith) snubbed in favour of the same-sex unions favouring Cardinal Schӧnborn in leading the German speaking discussion groups?
  • Why did  Cardinals write a letter to “the FP” about manipulation of the synod?
  • Why is the man sitting on the chair of St Peter trying to make himself look like the victim, when he is the one who is conspiring?
  • Why was a Catholic priest’s press credentials (of 15 years’ reporting on Vatican News) revoked after he challenged Archbishop Durocher over whether Communion for the divorced and remarried is up for debate?

Warning against “the hermeneutics of conspiracy”

is just another way of twisting the truth –

something “the FP” is so good at.

Now, I ask you – who is guilty of conspiracy?

Note: FP refers to the man who sits on the chair of Peter.

http://biblefalseprophet.com/2015/10/09/the-opening-address-of-the-synod-was-faithful/

https://biblefalseprophet.com/2015/10/12/cardinal-schonborn-you-aint-seen-nuthin-yet/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-vatican-revokes-catholic-priests-press-credentials-after-he-challe

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/thirteen-cardinals-confront-pope-francis-over-manipulation-of-synod?utm_source=LifePetitions+petition+signers&utm_campaign=1927d8bf72-Update_to_Catholic_LifePetitions_list10_12_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c5c75ce940-1927d8bf72-397770969