You can’t miss seeing the signs. These are some of the ones you might remember. (They are all in some of our past posts).
There are several reasons why these statues are blasphemous and not representational of the Blessed Virgin Mary and Saint Elizabeth.
Firstly they are not representational of their respective states of chastity. In what situation would anyone ever represent a virgin as pregnant and nude? In our culture we have created many ways to symbolise Mary’s virginity while simultaneously showing her motherhood.
She is always humbly and modestly clothed, she often has a halo over/around her head or a crown of Glory and/or is engaged in prayer, openly reflecting God’s glory. She is not introspective (looking to self) but rather reflects always on God.
St. Elizabeth would likewise be modestly dressed to represent her Chastity and holiness but also her advanced age. There is no difference in age noted between the two figurines on the mandala. Except if you consider the taller figure as older. However, this would be anatomically incorrect in that Saint Elizabeth was approximately six months pregnant at the time of visitation and Mary was only a few days pregnant – the gestational stages do not add up when you look at the figurines/statues. Cultural expressions aside, there could have been particular specific symbols to convey the essential nature- of Mary in particular- but these things are lacking and the opposite is conveyed- denigrating and blaspheming the Holy Mother of God.
But there’s more- and this shows the real purpose. If these are statues of the Blessed Virgin Mary and Saint Elizabeth, then why is there also, on the same circle or Mandala, a statue of a naked man lying down with an erect p***s?! Can you explain why you would you put that in the same “story”- when you were talking about The Blessed Virgin Mary and Saint Elizabeth, supposedly ‘justly’ representing Mary’s virginity -and chastity in Saint Elizabeth’s case- and their holiness? No, it does not add up. Not unless you were choosing to represent something entirely different in reality and presenting a very false, deceitful, unbelievable excuse as to what these things represented, to the rest of the world. No, these were not what they said they were- and you would have to be very gullible and somewhat ignorant, with no Catholic sensibility and very little sensitivity, to accept- even from a distance- that these idols could be representing saints!!
The first identifies them specifically as pagan goddesses and gods/idols and all three or four statues (there may be 2 male statues) are part of a pagan fertility ritual. You can read about that here:
The second narrative is more about why -and what the intended meaning is for the Masons. Because Freemasons use symbols to represent and announce things to the world- to their own kind- and do so through ceremonies and rituals.
This ritual was important.
So was the Tucum ring FP accepted, representing his secret commitment to the worst form of Liberation Theology.
(You can read more about that here: https://panamazonsynodwatch.info/feature/will-the-upcoming-synod-be-amazonian-or-masonic/)
This ritual ceremony signified the imminent spiritual birth (or reign)
of the Anti-Christ.
Just as Saint John the Baptist preceded and announced The Christ – preparing the way for Him – the false prophet prepares the way for the Anti-Christ. In this sense then, the 2 statues are mimicking Mary and Elizabeth who were to give birth to Christ and his forerunner- John the Baptist. This is so very Masonic. The 2 smaller male statues therefore, represent the False Prophet and the Antichrist – both in their spiritual infancy.
Whereas Christ is born of a Virgin, the reverse is true of the AC. He is born of a Hebrew prostitute (a false nun), fathered by an evil Bishop- in league with Satan. There seems no other explanation of what these statues were announcing. And judging by that, if that’s what the Masons were announcing, then we can expect the AC to begin his public ministry in a little less than 9 months time.
To further offend God and profane His temple, the abominable idol then was brought in to God’s Church (St. Peter’s no less) and FP has welcomed them as the official symbols of the Amazonian Synod… Apt symbols for an evil synod indeed!
Deacon Nick Donnelly says it all on Twitter:
Already within days, we have had the breaking of the First Commandment -on sacred ground, the denial of the Divinity of Christ by the FP (Francis) and then the announcement of the plans to build a new headquarter for Chrislam!
Things are moving fast now!
Because the FP really wants to sell PANTHEISM- as well as all paths lead to God. This is required for the New One World Religion which is to come. But first he must destroy the Catholic Church (in all her teachings) so that the daily sacrifice (The Eucharist) can be replaced by the Abomination of Desolation. He denies Christ as ‘The’ Messiah to make way for the ‘new messiah’ who will be the AC.
“My enemies will blind My people to the Truth and soon Christians will become like pagans. I will be thrown out into the gutter like a pauper and the doors of My Church will be slammed in My Face. And when I knock at the door it will be bolted from the inside by those who claim to come from Me.” ((18 Nov.2014)
“The day you pay homage to false gods under My Roof will be the day I will storm My Temple and destroy all within it. How lukewarm is the faith of some of My servants who strive to impress the populace and seek adulation. How little respect is shown to Me in My Own House, when everything that I gave you is tossed aside with indifference until, eventually, nothing of Me will remain within My Church.” (15 Nov.2014)