Those who are not fooled. (‘Querida Amazonia’) Part 2



Of course, many can see right through the pretend pope’s actions.

Here are a few comments sent to me from friends:

From Tony M:
Hi Everyone,
An excellent, excellent article by Fred Martinez of ‘Catholic Monitor’ explaining how Querida Amazonia uses word games
to bring so many Catholics to worship false gods without them even noticing…conservative Catholics who cannot see they have been tricked by a ‘master of deception’.
Bergoglio, on at least one occasion, said the God does not do magic … part of an argument denying some of God’s authentic miracles.
Well, it would seem that Bergoglio is the ‘magician’ as he…. with ease….. deceives good conservative/orthodox Catholics…..
towards abandoning the True Catholic Faith…..for the New False Church that embraces all religions……. including the Pachamama idolatry of the Amazon region.
(Will the next trick be a Synod of ….Congo…. Borneo….. Antartica….the Pacific…..outer Mongolia…..the Nile River…. Can I put in an application for the Murray River region of Australia???!)
Hold on to your hats folks; we are in for a very tricky ride…….. where most have not a clue where they are being led.
He is brazen and brilliant in his deception of so many.
But for those who are seeing the big picture of his plan to destroy the Catholic faith, he is not so brilliant…..his game is transparent to them.
But it is only the few who see through those eyes.
And they are the ‘Remnant of the True Church’ as it approaches its ‘Final Trial’ as referred to in  Catechism of the Catholic Church….

“The Church’s ultimate trial 675 Before Christ’s second coming the Church must pass through a final trial that will shake the faith of many believers.”

These people who are being deceived by Bergoglio….. with such ease need to start listening to God....because God has told us of this time of tribulation.
Time for the PhD commentators to realize that the only one who fully understands what is happening here is God…. not them!!!
Time to listen to Him!!!

(Wakey Wakey.) And GOD BLESS,


The article Tony mentioned by Fred Martinez at the Catholic Monitor is:

“Pachamama Exhortation: Is Pachamama Idolatry okay if it’s called “taking up an Indigenous Symbol”?   

Updated February 12, 2020
We had the Pachamama Synod.
Do we now have the Pachamama exhortation?
At the Amazon Synod, Francis said that the pagan Pachamama idols that were bowed down to had no “idolatrous intentions.”
It appears that Francis in his Amazon Synod exhortation Querida Amazonia section 79 doubled down that it is admissible to bow down to Pachamama idols if they are called “an indigenous symbol”:
“[It] is possible to take up an indigenous symbol in some way, without considering it as idolatry.”
This is like an Arian heretic saying: … Read it at:

Tony also mentions another article:

Hi everyone,
Below is another insightful article from George Neumayr of the Spectator.
It sheds clear light on the Apostolic Exhortation…. ‘Querida Amazonia’.
Many commentators have been saying the document is not so bad after all….they were expecting worse that this.
WEEEELLL. It is all still moving in the same direction….married priests….women deacons….embracing all religions including the pagan ones.
The agenda was simply pulled back a little…. in time….. because of the Cardinal Sarah/Pope Benedict book on priestly celibacy.
It would be naivity in the extreme to think the above agenda has in some way been abandoned.
Lets keep our wits about us.
Bergoglio’s slight of hand was to not state all of those things clearly to us in the Exhortation .….but to point us to the Final Amazonian Synod document.
Don’t know that I have seen a trickier operator anywhere in my lifetime.
And he thinks we can’t see what he is up to. (Tony M.)

“The Pope’s Slippery ‘Synodal’ Way: His exhortation about the Amazon synod raises more questions than it answers.”

February 16, 2020, 12:03 AM

“Typical of a Jesuit,” said Archbishop Bruno Forte in 2016, as he reflected on the deviously indirect style of Pope Francis. Forte, a close aide to Pope Francis, recalled that the pope didn’t want to spell out his support for Communion for the divorced and remarried in his exhortation Amoris Laetitia, lest it cause too much backlash. Forte quoted the pope saying, “If we speak explicitly about Communion for the divorced and remarried, you do not know what a terrible mess we will make. So we won’t speak plainly, do it in a way that the premises are there, then I will draw out the conclusions.”

In his latest exhortation, Querida Amazonia, the pope adopts a similarly opaque style. After having engineered a synod in which he had chosen all the fathers — a synod that he knew would reach conclusions in favor of married priests and female deacons — he decided to write an exhortation silent on those questions. The exhortation amounts to a papal punt. The question now is: Who will pick it up?

The exhortation, after all, urges people to “apply” the work of the synod. Were the exhortation a definitive rejection of married priests and female deacons, why would the pope say that?

Read the whole article here:

Finally, in conclusion, I quote fron Fr. John Zuhlsdorf:

Fr Z mentions the “bitter fruit” resulting from all these synods. He describes very well the process:

“And this bitter fruit…

We had – for centuries – councils on the papacy and on the episcopacy.
We need a Synod on synodality (seriously)

— Massimo Faggioli (@MassimoFaggioli) February 12, 2020

Yeah… that’s what we need.  More synods (“walking together”).  Let’s talk about walking together while we are walking together.  And then we’ll talk about the fact that we talked and walked. And then we’ll write about talking and walking and talk about the walking and the writing about the talking, until we’ve written something that we can talk and write about some more!”

Fr Z. speaks about the puzzle pieces that emerge from this Apostolic Exhortation:

“These are puzzle pieces. Slowly a picture might emerge as they fit together. That picture might not be what we would prefer it to be.

This is one of the reasons why, on both the faithful and traditional and conservative side… as well as one the iconoclastic and papalatrous left… we should all be careful about leaks and possible campaigns of disinformation. The risk of getting things wrong isn’t worth getting to the story FIRST! Truth is more important than clicks.

Lastly, the beginning of that Amazon Synod will forever be tainted by the FACT of veneration of a demonic idol, Pachamama Its process and deliberations will forever be tainted by the presence of demonic idolsIts conclusion will forever be tainted by the placing of a bowl with demonic symbols and purpose on the altar of St. Peter’s Basilica.

It is remarkable, really, that nothing worse came from this.”

Read the whole of FR Z’s article at:

In a nutshellHow can anything that is consecrated to demonic idols be anything but diabolical?



Don’t be fooled! (Querida Amazonia) Part 1


I was surprised that so many people after reading the recent apostolic exhortation “Querida Amazonia”, say things like n- “Well that was lucky, we dodged a bullet”. Really? These are good Catholics who are aware of, and disturbed by, the goings-on in the church. How could they be so naive? A leopard doesn’t change his spots. We have had 7 years of his antics, why would he change now? The pretend pope is cunning.

The truth is that Pope Benedict and Cardinal Sarah knocked him out of his comfort zone. They decided to write a book about celibacy, it seems right after the “Instrumentem Laboris” was published last year. They were one step ahead. They knew what was coming.

It was kept secret and then released just before the pretend pope could announce his apostolic exhortation of the Amazonian Synod. It seems he was very angry! But why would he be angry if he wasn’t intending to change the rule about celibacy? It seems Gänswein didn’t do his job properly as a spy, between the households of the Pope and the pretend pope, and as a result suffered the brunt of the pretend pope’s anger.

So when the pretend pope didn’t explicitly mention “celibacy” and “women deacons”, the blind faithful reacted with joy. But they missed the point, he was just very cunning about it.

Read the document here:





Let’s just examine a few excerpts as an example:

  1. During the Synod, I listened to the presentations and read with interest the reports of the discussion groups. In this Exhortation, I wish to offer my own response to this process of dialogue and discernment. I will not go into all of the issues treated at length in the final document. Nor do I claim to replace that text or to duplicate it. I wish merely to propose a brief framework for reflection that can apply concretely to the life of the Amazon region a synthesis of some of the larger concerns that I have expressed in earlier documents, and that can help guide us to a harmonious, creative and fruitful reception of the entire synodal process.”

* What this means:
The whole synod document is a footnote to this apostolic exhortation,
and the pretend pope (pp or FP as in False Prophet)  has not closed the door on women priests or married priests.

  1. “In the Eucharist, God, “in the culmination of the mystery of the Incarnation, chose to reach our intimate depths through a fragment of matter”. The Eucharist “joins heaven and earth; it embraces and penetrates all creation”.[116] For this reason, it can be a “motivation for our concerns for the environment, directing us to be stewards of all creation”.[117] In this sense, “encountering God does not mean fleeing from this world or turning our back on nature”.[118] It means that we can take up into the liturgy many elements proper to the experience of indigenous peoples in their contact with nature, and respect native forms of expression in song, dance, rituals, gestures and symbols. The Second Vatican Council called for this effort to inculturate the liturgy among indigenous peoples;[119] over fifty years have passed and we still have far to go along these lines.[120]”

* What this means:
The first commandment is abolished and paganism is now officially incorporated into the Mass

  1. At the same time, I would like to officially present the Final Document, which sets forth the conclusions of the Synod, which profited from the participation of many people who know better than myself or the Roman Curia the problems and issues of the Amazon region, since they live there, they experience its suffering and they love it passionately. I have preferred not to cite the Final Document in this Exhortation, because I would encourage everyone to read it in full.”

**That means he is supporting everything entailed and described and recommended in the final Document of the Synod. He is just not going to mention it in the exhortation. Instead he wants everyone to read it and study it in full. In other words, all of it is so important, that he wants us all to study it in its entirety.

  1. Everything that the Church has to offer must become incarnate in a distinctive way in each part of the world, so that the Bride of Christ can take on a variety of faces that better manifest the inexhaustible riches of God’s grace. Preaching must become incarnate, spirituality must become incarnate, ecclesial structures must become incarnate. For this reason, I humbly propose in this brief Exhortation to speak of four great dreams that the Amazon region inspires in me.”

** This means the Church will no longer be “One, holy, catholic and Apostolic. The church will be different all over the world. Preaching and spirituality will become ‘incarnate’ i.e. reflecting each separate culture – paganism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism  you name it. The real Incarnation of God made man and the preaching of it will become extinct.

  1. I dream of an Amazon region that fights for the rights of the poor, the original peoples and the least of our brothers and sisters, where their voices can be heard and their dignity advanced.

I dream of an Amazon region that can preserve its distinctive cultural riches, where the beauty of our humanity shines forth in so many varied ways.

I dream of an Amazon region that can jealously preserve its overwhelming natural beauty and the superabundant life teeming in its rivers and forests.

I dream of Christian communities capable of generous commitment, incarnate in the Amazon region, and giving the Church new faces with Amazonian features.”

**I dream too – of a Church where Christ’s voice can be heardwhere people everywhere can recognize Christ’s teaching; where the beauty of our Faith, founded by Jesus Christ, the Son of God shines forth. Christian communities who are ‘incarnate in the Amazon region which give the Church new faces with Amazonian features’ – is my worst nightmare!




The titles of the chapters say it all – it is communism, Marxism, – in fact it is the “new humanism” which the pretend pope(FP) told us about last year. Read paragraphs 8-27 in the Vatican Exhortation. See link above.


“journey alongside(Where have we heard that before?)

  1. “As she perseveres in the preaching of the kerygma, the Church also needs to grow in the Amazon region. In doing so, she constantly reshapes her identity through listening and dialogue with the people, the realities and the history of the lands in which she finds herself. In this way, she is able to engage increasingly in a necessary process of inculturation that rejects nothing of the goodness that already exists in Amazonian cultures, but brings it to fulfilment in the light of the Gospel.[84] Nor does she scorn the richness of Christian wisdom handed down through the centuries, presuming to ignore the history in which God has worked in many ways. For the Church has a varied face, “not only in terms of space… but also of time”.[85] Here we see the authentic Tradition of the Church, which is not a static deposit or a museum piece, but the root of a constantly growing tree.[86] This millennial Tradition bears witness to God’s work in the midst of his people and “is called to keep the flame alive rather than to guard its ashes”.[87]

** Really? The church constantly reshapes her identity…? a museum piece?  “keep the flame alive – ? which flame? The only flame I see is paganism, which the pretend pope wants to intertwine with Christ’s Church. And he refers to longstanding unchanged Tradition as ashes!

“The inculturation of the liturgy

81. The inculturation of Christian spirituality in the cultures of the original peoples can benefit in a particular way from the sacraments, since they unite the divine and the cosmic, grace and creation. In the Amazon region, the sacraments should not be viewed in discontinuity with creation. They “are a privileged way in which nature is taken up by God to become a means of mediating supernatural life.[114] They are the fulfillment of creation, in which nature is elevated to become a locus and instrument of grace, enabling us “to embrace the world on a different plane”.[115]

** Well, that’s the weirdest description of liturgy and the Sacraments I have ever heard! “nature is taken up to God”,… “fulfillment of Creation”…(nature) “mediating supernatural life”. Actually, the pretend pope is saying that nature is a god and  “is elevated to become a locus and instrument of grace”.  

Well, that is just a little taste.  I don’t want to read any more. You get the drift. We can’t trust the pretend pope. We should know that by now. He is the “False Prophet” of Revelation. He is the one preparing for, and paving the way for the Antichrist. All his actions point to it.

He is destroying the Church and making way for a church of darkness.

It’s all in the prophecies.