Tag: St Robert Ballarmine

From saints, cardinals,and bishops: heresy, popes and canon law.

AM+DG

Shared from: https://abyssum.org/ 

POPE BENEDICT’S RESIGNATION WAS INVALID, HE IS STILL THE POPE

Posted on June 15, 2022 by abyssum

THE CATHOLIC MONITOR

In 2012 even Leftist America said a Pope’s Resignation “had to be cleared by Canon Law; it was determined that if the resignation was Voluntary, Enacted Properly and Absolutely Necessary”

Anti Pope Francis Antipope, Heretic and Antichrist Apostate (Jorge Bergoglio)

It’s very interesting that in 2012 even the leftist America was saying about a pope’s resignation:

“This had to be cleared by canon law; it was determined that if the resignation was voluntary, enacted properly and absolutely necessary.” – The Catholic Monitor

There are three basic schools of thought on this phenomenon, the first of which has been nicknamed “Benevacantism.” The first two theories were openly discussed by Burke and Coffin (and summarized by Alt in his post), the third was only hinted at. The three theories are:

  1. Pope Benedict’s resignation was invalid; he is still pope. (Advocates: Bp. Rene Gracida, Antonio Socci, Msgr. Nicola Bux.)
  2. The conclave that elected Pope Francis was invalid or corrupt, thus voiding the election of Pope Francis.(Advocates: While I am not aware of any prominent figures who have announced explicitly that they believe Francis is not pope based on an invalid conclave, those advancing the possibility include Church Militantand Roberto de Mattei.)
  3. The resignation of Pope Benedict was valid, as was the election of Pope Francis. But sometime after his election, Pope Francis officially promulgated heresy from the See of Peter, and thereby abdicated his office automatically. (Proponents: the signatories of the Open Letter to the College of Bishops, including Fr. Aidan Nichols, Peter Kwasniewski, Fr. John Hunwicke, and John Rist.)

In a December 2016 interview with Catholic World Report, Burke was asked what might lead to the abdication of a pope:

CWR: Some people are saying that the pope could separate himself from communion with the Church. Can the pope legitimately be declared in schism or heresy?

Burke: If a Pope would formally profess heresy he would cease, by that act, to be the Pope. It’s automatic. And so, that could happen.

CWR: That could happen.

Burke: Yes.

The clear implication here, as well as the explanation for Cardinal Burke’s rejection of virtually everything that Pope Francis has formally taught, is that he thinks Francis hasn’t taught anything magisterial because he doesn’t believe Francis is pope. – Where Peter Is [https://wherepeteris.com/does-cardinal-burke-think-francis-is-an-antipope/%5D

Recently, the Modernist leftist America is discussing the possibility of Francis resigning:

This announcement might have gone unnoticed had it not been that Celestine V was the first pope to resign voluntarily, and that Benedict XVI had made a pilgrimage to the same pope’s tomb four years before announcing his resignation from the chair of Peter. It was this, Gerry says, “that provided ammunition for the guns of speculation.” 

And while neither Gerry nor Colleen believes a papal resignation is imminent, on this episode of “Inside the Vatican” they consider the reasons to heed, or not, the rumors that Pope Francis will soon follow in the footsteps of Benedict XVI and Celestine V.[https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2022/06/09/pope-francis-retire-resign-podcast-2022-243132]

Moreover, why might Francis have been talking in 2021 about Dante since he is apparently only mostly interested in the socialist this-world utopias and rarely, if ever, talks about the Heaven and Hell of the poet’s epic?

Might it have something to do with Dante’s calling one of Pope Benedict XVI’s favorite popes, Pope Celestine V, who resigned a coward in Hell?

In 2013, Mark Giszczak wrote:

St. Celestine V. Scott Hahn made an interesting post in which he mentions Pope Benedict’s two trips to pray by the tomb and relics (respectively) of Celestine V–notably the Pope left his pallium on Celestine’s tomb on April 29, 2009. (Interestingly, as Rocco Palmo notes, this pallium was the one with which Benedict was originally vested. The pope “retired” it from use and went to a smaller size of pallium. More here: Fr. Z, NLM)…

… Now, on to Dante! In his Inferno, Canto III, lines 58-63 (in Dorothy Sayers’ translation) we read:

And when I’d noted here and there a shade
Whose face I knew, I saw and recognized
The coward spirit of the man who made

The great refusal; and that proof sufficed;
Here was that rabble, here without a doubt,
Whom God and whom His enemies despised.

Now, Celestine is found in Hell’s “vestibule” here with the futile, who run around after meaningless banners, goaded by hornets. They are at the very “top” so to speak, of Dante’s Hell. Dante’s condemnation of Celestine V was rooted in the problematic reign of his successor, Boniface VIII, who imprisoned his predecessor. Apparently, Dante felt that Celestine should have embraced the office and out of cowardice or a faint heart, he abdicated, which led to very bad things in the reign of the next pope. Celestine died in a fetid jail cell. [https://catholicbiblestudent.com/2013/02/pope-benedict-xvi-resigns-dante.html]

Did Boniface kill Celestine by jailing him?

Francis apologist Fr. Dwight Longenecker shows that Francis knows all about Celestine:

Dante placed Boniface in hell for his crimes and it was Boniface VIII who pushed papal claims to worldly power to their most extreme point. A corrupt and ambitious man, Boniface demanded that all people be subject to the Roman Pontiff and insisted that kings and princes bow to his power. After power struggles with King Philip IV of France, Boniface was imprisoned and it was rumored that he took his own life — by gnawing off his own arms and bashing his head against a wall. Boniface was accused of many horrible crimes by his enemies, and even if innocent of the worst offenses, he was still a completely worldly man world who stands as the stunning contrast to Celestine’s simplicity and godliness.

By proclaiming a jubilee year in honor of Celestine Pope Francis is making a clear call for all Catholics to turn away from the worldly values of power, pride and corruption and walk in the way of Christ. [https://www.patheos.com/blogs/standingonmyhead/2014/07/the-real-celestine-prophecy.html]

In 2012, the Francis apologist leftist America magazine wrote an article about “Celestine’s Prophecy”:

Celestine V, the pope who quit, is remembered mostly as a footnote. Histories of the popes treat him as a medieval curiosity. Dante condemned him to the inferno for his cowardice. More recently, his resignation has been viewed as the odd precedent that would permit an ailing pope to step down… 

… He [Celestine] announced that he would resign, the first and only pope to do so.

This had to be cleared by canon law; it was determined that if the resignation was voluntary, enacted properly and absolutely necessary—if the pope was useless or suffered a serious impediment such as insanity—resignation would be acceptable.

The holy man, officially deemed useless, fled. But his authoritarian successor, Pope Boniface VIII, was evidently uneasy with having another pope about and ordered him imprisoned. It is “not far-fetched” to suggest that Boniface had Peter [Celestine] murdered.[https://www.americamagazine.org/issue/culture/celestines-prophecy ]

It’s very interesting that in 2012 even the leftist America was saying about a pope’s resignation:

“This had to be cleared by canon law; it was determined that if the resignation was voluntary, enacted properly and absolutely necessary.”

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

–  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.’”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

…

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.SHARE

IS IT LOGICAL THAT A MAN WHO OCCUPIES THE CHAIR OF PETER CAN BE BOTH A HERETIC AND THE POPE?

AM+DG

Reblog from Bp. Gracia’s website. See reblogged article below the Comment.

(Comment by admin/editor of RemnantDiscciples JtM):

The article by Fr. Belland expresses what all true Catholic faithful feel is true, and must be so – yet they cannot see that this exactly means that the obvious answer staring them in the face, is that Benedict is the true pope. If they investigated all the intricacies of canon law, they would see this. (How about just reading Bro Alexis Bugnolo’s examination of this question?)  In fact if they read the prophecies from saints – it would be clear as a bell.

God would not want us to be confounded, but knowing the minds of men, have sent us prophets, as in the Old Testament and New Testament when His people were in trouble. Granted, people to not always listen to prophets and they were always despised and struggled to to be heard, but this is not so today. We have people who have been proclaimed saints – who would doubt them? If there was any doubt about anything a saint said or did, do you think that they would be canonized?

Would you doubt St Francis of Assisi? He told us 800 years ago that there would be 2 popes – one would not be a true pope, but a destroyer! Well, guess who fits the bill?! Why don’t all priests and bishops proclaim this fact? Don’t they believe that God would sent saints?

What about Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich? She told us a lot about the Pope who “lives in a palace other than before” and who is suffering in Rome, and about the “Little Black Man” . In case you don’t know, Jesuits wear black, and the head of the Jesuits (which Bergoglio once was), has always traditionally been referred to as “the black pope”. She also mentions that “He has his agents in the NEW Black Church also” and many other things about him.

What about Our Lady – would they believe her? Way back in 1846, at La Salette, she said that “one will not know which is the true pope”. She also told us that “Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the antichrist”. This of course was confirmed at Fatima, but they were all too fearful to obey and pronounce the Third Secret in 1960, and the complete message is still under wrap.

What about St Paul? In his 2nd letter to the Thessalonians (2: 1-12), he speaks of the antichrist, then he says (vs.6-7) : “And now you know what has been restraining him (from being revealed), that he may be revealed in his time. …only he who now restrains  does so, until he is taken out of the way“.

It seems to me that this fits perfectly to what Fr Belland says in article below. Pope Benedict is the solution. When he is taken out of Rome  (see Bl. A.C. Emmerich), the Antichrist will be revealed.. Benedict is the one who restrains, (see St Paul 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12).

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

IS IT LOGICAL THAT A MAN WHO OCCUPIES THE CHAIR OF PETER CAN BE BOTH A HERETIC AND THE POPE?

Posted on January 27, 2021 by abyssum

Father David R. Belland writes to Abyssum out of his deep felt concern and love for the Church.

He suggests that If Our Lord promised that “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it,” His Bride, He means it.  Yet, what if a man who claims to be a pope becomes a heretic or seemingly teaches heresy?  That question has been pondered down the ages, and to this day no absolute answer has really been provided.  In fact, for all the hypothetical scenarios concerning heresy, the possible solutions proposed by the learned theologians are just that: possible, but not in any way certain.  Michael Davies in his book, I Am with You Always: The Divine Constitution and Indefectibility of the Catholic Church, says the following:

 Saint Robert was (in De Romano Pontifice Vol. II, chap. 30, p. 720), of course, discussing a theoretical possibility, and believed that a pope could not become an heretic and thus could not be deposed, but he also acknowledged that the more common opinion was that the pope could become an heretic, and he was thus willing to discuss what would need to be done if, per impossible, this should happen: ‘This opinion (that the Pope could not become an heretic) is probable and easily defended. . . . Nonetheless, in view of the fact that this is not certain, and that the common opinion is the opposite one, it is useful to examine the solution to this question, within the hypothesis that the Pope can be an heretic’ [De Romano Pontifice, Vol. II, chap.30, p.418].  The great Jesuit theologian, Francisco de Suarez (1548-1617) was also sure that God’s ‘sweet providence’ would never allow the one who could not teach error to fall into error, and that this was guaranteed by the promise Ego autem rogavi pro te… (Luke 22:32).  But, like Bellarmine, Suarez was willing to consider the possibility of an heretical pope as an hypothesis, particularly in view of the fact, he claimed, that several ‘general councils had admitted the hypothesis in question’ [De legibus, vol. IV, chap. 7, no. 10, p 361].  Saint Alphonsus Ligouri (1696-1787) did not believe that God would ever permit a Roman Pontiff to become a public or an occult (secret) heretic, even as a private person:  ‘We ought rightly to presume as Cardinal Bellarmine declared, that God will never let it happen that a Roman Pontiff, even as a private person, become a public heretic or an occult heretic’ [Dogmatic Works of St. Alphonsus Maria de Ligouri, Vol. VIII, p. 720].”[1] 

 [1] Michael Davies, I Am With You Always: The Divine Constitution and Indefectibility of the Catholic Church, New rev. ed. 1997, The Neumann Press, Long Prairie, Minnesota, 1997, pp. 44 – 4 )

 Certainly, God would not allow his Church to be left in the dust of doubt either with regard to Faith or with regard to Morals. Considering the reality of the situation in the Church today, therefore, one that is absolutely unparalleled, indeed exceptional, can one really look to the past for a solution, which no one has actually demonstrated to be absolutely workable for past crises, or to merely theoretical scenarios envisioned for the future?  Yet, those theoretical problems discussed in the past in no way even remotely approach the unprecedented reality here and now.  

The mind of Father David R. Belland resolutely balks at the idea. He asks: “Does it not seem more likely that the unprecedented reality of today demands an unprecedented concrete solution?  And can you guess what’s coming; yes, you’re right, Benedict is that unprecedented, yet concrete, solution that if looked into can be seen as that unquestionable protection of God.”

Perhaps a better way of stating the QUESTION is this.

A man who occupies the Chair of Peter is called the Pope.

A man who occupies the Chair of Peter seems to be a public heretic or occult heretic, yet it is not reasonable that God would ever permit a Roman Pontiff to become a public or an occult (secret) heretic, even as a private person: 

Ergo, such a man who occupies the Chair of Peter is not the Pope.

Why can’t they see? A cry from the heart!

AM+DG

Article by Tony M.

“Questions to my Pre-Bergoglian Orthodox Catholic friends

  • To those pre-Bergoglian orthodox-traditional-true Catholics…………those who felt safe in the Truth under Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI……who thought nothing could divert them or take them from the True Catholic Faith they were born & baptised into……
  • To those Catholics who have a great love of Our Blessed Mother and who, for decades, have been following Her messages through various visionaries & locutionaries around the world…….
  • To all of those same people who now ………  support Jorge Mario Bergoglio as being their Pope, and who thus support all he is saying and doing as he speaks to the Catholic world and the world generally…….
  • To those people I ask, “In all the years of your lives on this planet….. under those various popes….before Bergoglio came on the scene……

Question No 1.     Did you ever imagine that one day you would be throwing your support behind a heretic??

Question No 2.      Did you ever imagine that the heretic you would be supporting.…..would be the one who sits on the Chair of Peter??

ISN’T IT AMAZING THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAS HAPPENED????

Question No. 3  Have you always believed a Pope can announce Heresy and blasphemy from the Chair of Peter??

Question No 4.  At what point in time did you come to accept a Pope could serially announce heresy to the world to the extent of his being manifestly apostate but still remain validly the Pope…….was it in the time of previous Popes you have lived under, like Pope John Paul II or Pope Benedict XVI, or was in the time of Bergoglio that you came to accept an heretical papacy as being possible??

Question No 5.     Did you ever imagine that the Prophecy of La Salette….. which you had never really doubted the authenticity of…..would begin to occur in your lifetime??

‘Rome will lose the Faith & become the seat of the anti-Christ’

To those people I say, please for your own sake and the sake of those you know and love, it is time to start looking closely and seriously at all Bergoglio has said and done, since he assumed the Chair of Peter in March, 2013.

Please, please, please don’t hide from what he is saying and doing…….look very closely at it  through the eyes of a true, longstanding, orthodox Catholic that you had always been…..and defend the teachings of the Catholic Faith you were born into and love so much……defend those teachings by standing against the one who has been systematically destroying those teachings over the last 7 years.

Don’t say, “But, but, but he is the Pope.”

No Pope in history has said and done what Bergoglio has from the Chair of Peter in Rome.

It is not possible for a valid Pope to have conducted himself as Bergoglio has.

Anyone who believes a pope can behave as Bergoglio has over the last 7 years has a massively diminished understanding of what a Pope is….what the ‘Rock’ is.

St Robert Bellarmine confirms this by saying,

‘A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church’.

Cardinal Burke said as much after Bergoglio signed the disgraceful Abu Dhabi document saying ‘all religions were willed by God’.

Given the litany of heresies that have come from his mouth and pen since he took the Chair, it is manifest to all orthodox Catholics who are looking closely at Bergoglio’s words and deeds……it is manifest that he is a serial, pertinacious heretic.

It is manifest with the help of modern media, most specifically….the internet.

All he has said and done since March, 2013 is all over the internet and cannot be deleted. So it is manifest on the basis that it is all there for everyone on the planet to see. It is there today, it will be there tomorrow, and it will continue to be there for a long time to come. Therefore IT IS MANIFEST to the world.

It is also manifest on the basis that some of his heresies have been proven through the documents produced by the theologians and high level academics, those documents being ‘The Filial Correction’ relating to the Apostolic Exhortation, “Amoris Laetitia’, and The ‘Letter to the Bishops’. These documents lay out actual proof of some of his heresies which he has refused to retract, but which he instead, asserted as with the  heresies of Amoris Laetitia, must be seen as Magisterial Teaching. If this does not represent manifest heresy, I will eat my hat & my socks as well.

The other angle on the manifest nature of the reality of his being a heretic is that we have a situation where, well beyond ‘Amoris Laetitia’ and ‘Querida Amazonia’ he has spewed out a plethora of statements that have been peppered with heretical & blasphemous meanings over tha last seven years. And those statements are all over the internet for the entire population of the world to see…..and repeating…..they cannot be deleted. The point is that the heresies and blasphemies have been a continuous flow for seven years. If a baptised Catholic continues over time to announce one heresy, after another, after another….many, many heresies…..it becomes manifest that he is a heretic on the basis of the sheer number and consistent nature of the flow of those heresies from his mouth and pen.

If you have a street preacher who calls himself a Catholic, day, after day, proclaiming heresy. after heresy. from his soapbox…. the only possible conclusion is that he is a heretic…it is manifest.

If the man on the Chair of Peter, day, after day is proclaiming heresy, after heresy,  from  the Chair, the only possible conclusion is that he is a heretic…it is manifest.

I am not a qualified theologian. I cannot put ‘Dr’ in front of my name because I do not have a Ph.D.  But I am a baptised Catholic, who upholds the 2000 year Constant Magisterial Teaching of the Catholic Church. I was educated in science & mathematics at University level, and have been trained in the use of logic. I do not need a theologian to tell me whether or not so many of Bergoglio’s statements are heretical, because like all orthodox (ie true) Catholics I am operating with the ‘Sensus Fidelium’, the sense of what is Catholic and what is not Catholic, particularly having been born into, and being an altar boy in the pre-conciliar Church. The fact of my not being a theologian will be of no excuse for me on judgement day if I go along with the heresies of Bergoglio.

A ten year old child, taught properly in the basics of the Catholic Faith, would be able to identify with ease so many of the heresies coming from the mouth and pen of this Bergoglio.

My point is that, his being a heretic, is MANIFEST TO THE WORLD…..particularly with the facilitation of modern communications including the World Wide Web.

Therefore it is manifest to the world….as per St Robert Bellarmine’s statement…..that Bergoglio is not the Pope…..because his heretical nature is manifest to the world.

There are many other facts in relation to the election process that reveal an overwhelming probability of an invalid Papacy. These also potentially invalidate this supposed papacy, whether by his being a heretic before he was elected, whether by an invalid resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, or whether by a canonically flawed and invalid conclave due to vote canvassing and other issues. Any one of these, if investigated comprehensively, would most likely prove an invalid election.

Don’t kid yourself, if you are saying “There is much of what he has said and done that I do not like, but he is the Pope, is the Pope, is the Pope”.

What is it you don’t like in what he has said??

Is it simply some minor misdemeanours and harmless, loose tongued announcements globally to the Catholic Faithful???

Or is it something much more serious???

If it is the serial announcement of heresies, blasphemies along with sacrilegiously and scandalously bad example in the form idol worshipping in the Vatican Gardens…… that is something different altogether??

THAT CANNOT BE CONVENIENTLY SWEPT UNDER THE CARPET……AND THEN WE MOVE FORWARD AS IF NOTHING HAD HAPPENED.

If you are supporting him in any way, you are implicitly supporting all he says and does, as he, without opposition, is audaciously and brazenly hereticising Catholics in their millions all over the planet, with the resultant loss of souls that necessarily follows.  Jesus said “Let your ‘yes’ be ‘yes’, and let your ‘no’ be ‘no’.”

Bergoglio is causing devastation to the beliefs of heretofore longstanding faithful Catholics.

One pre-Bergoglian orthodox Catholic lady who receives my emails (and I hers ) and who still defends Bergoglio, recently criticised Archbishop Vigano in relation to his letter to President Trump by saying, “I am critical of his disloyalty and disrespect to our Holy Father, Pope Francis, who is anointed and appointed by God.”

I would immediately retort, that there is much canon law evidence that he was not anointed and appointed by God to the papacy…..starting with a mountain of evidence he was well and truly entrenched in his heretical ways decades before he came to the Chair of Peter in March, 2013.

Anyone who believes a Pope can hereticise, blaspheme and idol worship before the entire world with the efficacious aid of the modern media, has a greatly skewed and diminished understanding of what a Pope is, and what the “Rock is, the Rock on which the Catholic Church was built.”

How long would the integrity of the True Faith have been preserved if Bergoglio had arrived in the 1st Century??

For how long would the Catholic Faith have been preserved in its pristine perfection and beauty if all of the Popes of history had performed as Bergoglio has over the last 7 years?????????????

Given this lady’s inability to counter the points made by the wise & courageous Archbishop Vigano, she has made a generalised attack against him without dealing with the actual issues and points he presented. Her argument amounts therefore to nothing, because it is not even an argument. It is a simple generalised assertion without providing a skerrick of material to support it.

An authentic Pope defends and teaches the Truth.

He does not change the Truth that was taught by Jesus, Who is the Truth.

The Truth does not and cannot change!!!

Bergoglio has been attempting to change the Truth which cannot be changed, and in doing so has been announcing heresy to the global Catholic Church & world

So we have a mammoth and disastrous apostasy materialising under Bergoglio.

And we have overwhelming evidence of the possibility of a canonically invalid election.

There is potential for us to be going into the area of ‘sins of omission’ by those who are hierarchically positioned to investigate, but who make a decision to NOT INVESTIGATE, whatever the excuse may be.

This is not to judge anyone, because many may be operating from the position of strategic timing….God is the Judge of that.

There is very much evidence of Canon Laws, and Apostolic Constitution laws being broken in the process of the St Gallen mafia modernist & masonic apostates manipulating events to get their heretical man to the Chair of Peter.

There is a truckload of evidence relating to this.

But no-one seems to have the will, the way, or the courage to do the investigation……. yet.

This does not mean that in practice an investigation legally cannot be done.

It can be done.

And the extreme state of things under Bergoglio screams out for a fully comprehensive examination of the events and processes that resulted in his (supposed) election.

If you think what I am saying here is outrageous, please, please, please do a concerted study of what Bergoglio has been doing and saying since March, 2013. This link makes it easy:- https://thewildvoice.org/pope-francis-chronology-perspective/. The source and date of each statement is mentioned with every statement quoted. So you can easily get to the source statement.

Be brave. Do your own investigation and hold tightly to our beloved faith.

Deliberate and wilful ignorance of his words and deeds, is no excuse where you have been well warned through all the controversies that have occurred since he came to the Chair on March 13, 2013.

I am simply attempting to defend the True Catholic Faith from the demolition job that is being done on it by Bergoglio and his modernist & masonic Church wrecking cronies.

Be outraged, but outraged, not by what I am saying, but by what they are doing!!!!

I am outraged and scandalised by his heresies announced with the use of slippery ambiguities.

I am particularly outraged and scandalised that some of these heresies that lead millions of Catholics to sacrilegious communion.

I am outraged and scandalised by the fact that Pachamama idols were worshipped in the Vatican gardens and desecrated St Peter’s Basilica.

ARE YOU???

I am under no illusion. I know the majority of baptised Catholics will go with Bergoglio’s New False Church which embraces all religions as prophesied by Bl Anne Catherine Emmerich. So many of these people have been thoroughly hereticised over the last fifty years since Vatican II……..Therefore it is a cakewalk for Bergoglio to take them with him.

A comprehensive investigation through an imperfect council would be the confirmation for those remaining true Catholics, who would then come together in the ‘Remnant Catholic Church of these End Times’.

But until an investigation is completed, we have every right and indeed a duty before God, to resist all heretical teaching coming from Bergoglio.

See below:

http://www.thirdorderofsaintdominic.org/Prophetic%20Warnings.html

“Finally they cannot be numbered among the schismatics, who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they consider his person to be suspect or doubtfully elected on account of rumors in circulation…” Wernz-Vidal: Ius Canonicum, Vol vii, n. 398.

 

“Neither is someone a schismatic for denying his subjection to the Pontiff on the grounds that he has solidly founded [probabiliter] doubts concerning the legitimacy of his election or his power [refs to Sanchez and Palao].” de Lugo: Disp., De Virt. Fid. Div., disp xxv, sect iii, nn. 35-8

 

“Nor is there any schism if one suspects the person of the pope or the validity of his election, or if one resists him as the civil head of a state.” Szal, Rev Ignatius: Communication of Catholics with Schismatics, CUA, 1948, p.2

So let us stay close to the Lord and His Holy Mother in prayer.

And let us cling tightly to the True Catholic Faith given to us by Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, and let no-one, no-one, no-one take us from it.

Our eternal future depends on it!!!!!

God Bless,

Tony

Addendum   (This taken from a recent YouTube presentation from Dr Taylor Marshall in an interview with Dr Ed Mazza)   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK1Zg1WyKI4&t=5937s

This part of the Interview makes references to the False Prophet, the Antichrist & today’s Church turmoil

This information below, was delivered by Dr Ed Mazza at the 1:36:44Hr mark of the interview.

Book The Apocalypse of St John (1921) by Fr Sylvester Berry.

  • Fr Berry examines the 12th & 13th Chapters of the Apocalypse of St John.

He says they foretell a usurpation of the Papal See by the False Prophet of anti-christ resulting in great tribulations befalling the Catholic Church. Fr Berry points out the Papacy which is the principle target of those who seek to establish reign of anti-christ. Heresy schism and the introduction of false worship upon the altars of the Catholic Churches are thus to be the direct results of the removal of the true Pope from the See of Rome and subsequent occupation of the Chair of Peter by the forces of anti-christ.

  • Fr Hermann Bernardt Kramer who wrote the Book of Destiny in 1955 which is also a comment on St John’s Book of Apocalypse. Kramer also speaks of a coming anti-pope who will produce a counterfeit Church and sacraments leading to a general apostasy.

 

  • Archbishop Fulton Sheen said, in the talk he gave in the late 1940’s about the antichrist, about the 2 churches, from the Signs of Our Times, from the Book “Antichrist and Crisis in the Church and Society from 1947“. Antichrist will not be so cold otherwise he will have no followers, there is no sin but there is no Judge and if there is no Judgement then ‘evil is good’ and ‘good is evil’. But above all of these descriptions Our Lord tells us that the antichrist will be so much like Himself that he would deceive even the elect. He will write books on the new Idea of God to suit the way people live. He will make men shrink in shame if their fellow men say they are not broadminded and liberal   He will be so broadminded as to identify tolerance with indifference…..indifference to right and wrong, truth and error  (Dr Mazza comment: ‘How about God wills the diversity of all religions’) He will spread the lie that men will never be better, until they make society better, and thus have selfishness to provide fuel for the next revolution. He will foster more divorces, under the disguise that another partner is vital. He will invoke religion to destroy religion. He will tell people who they should and should not marry and unmarry, who should bear children, who should not, because his religion will be the Brotherhood without the Fatherhood of God. He will deceive even the elect. He will set up a counterchurch which will be the ape of the Church, because he the Devil is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church but in reverse, and empty of its Divine content. It will be a ‘mystical body of the antichrist’ that will in all externals resemble the ‘Mystical Body of Christ’.

++++++++++++++++++++++

Editor’s comment:

When my friend, (Tony M.) sent me this this new article of his, I embraced it wholeheartedly.  It expresses what I feel – my sadness, and frustration at trying to help my friends, acquaintances and Church friends see that all is not well in the Church that we love! I think many of us share these feelings- we try our best, but it seems to no avail. They put all their trust in the clergy to lead them, but they also need our help, and our encouragement. It seems that many of us live, as it were, with a blindfold on convincing ourselves that all is good and in control. Tony expresses it all here, including many events that should never have been ignored.

%d bloggers like this: