Tag: amazon synod

Modernist bishops and strange innovations.

 

AM+DG

In these last few weeks,  Archbishop Mark Coleridge has made a few more statements to add to the history which shows his aversion to Catholic Doctrine. It is fast becoming quite a long list.

He was responsible for announcing this council after the synod of 2015. See our article 31 Dec. 2016 at:  https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2016/12/31/archbishop-mark-coleridge-showing-his-true-colours/  

An open letter was written in reply to this announcement which described the Council as ” …open and defiant schism, heresy and destruction of the Church…”.

This letter refers to all manner of heretical, blasphemous and evil ideas, including:
• Female ordination
• An end to priestly celibacy
• Communion for all
• Abortion
• Contraception
• Divorce
• Euthanasia
• Homosexuality

  • No seminaries

Headline: The Catholic church rethinks seminary training after its child abuse scandal

“Much has changed in our seminaries but one has to wonder whether seminaries are the place or way to train men for the priesthood now,” the Brisbane Archbishop told the Catholic online publication Crux Now in August last year.’                                        and

“But he has previously stated he is open to a priest “apprenticeship model” whereby men could receive broader training at universities and parishes while still being appropriately “formed” spiritually, intellectually and pastorally.”  (Archbishop Coleridge)

https://www.theage.com.au/national/the-catholic-church-rethinks-seminary-training-after-its-child-abuse-scandal-20190924-p52uhv.html

  • His most recent bombshell was that he wants to bless same-sex marriages

Headline: “Brisbane Archdiocese Promotes Blessings for Gay Couples” 

“A “rite of blessing” for same-sex couples and for the divorced and remarried was proposed at the conclusion of Brisbane Assembly 2019. “ (https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/australian-diocese-promotes-blessings-for-gay-couples)

  • A friend emailed me some more news today. It refers to the fact that months ago, it had been brought up that, because of the climate in the Amazon, some other substance (namely – ‘yukka’) could be used instead of wheat for Holy Communion. This, of course would be in contradiction to Church Law. Jesus used wheat. This, of course, was in the Archbishop’s diocese.

“With all the talk of the Yucca bread in the months preceding the Pan Amazon Synod farce, one of my friends from Brisbane (Australia) has sent me a photograph ..(see below).. of some Altar Bread that a friend of hers saw in the Sacristy of a Parish in the Brisbane Archdiocese. The lady who took the photograph was told by the sacristan of the parish, that these hosts will be used in the ‘near future’ in that parish.  (Does he mean after this Amazon Synod?)

I thought….. when my friend was describing this bread…. as we spoke on the phone…. that it would probably be like some hosts that I had seen before …with flecks of brown particles…. as in wholemeal bread.

But when I later saw the photographs that were sent to me by my friend, I immediately thought ‘NO, NO, NO….I HAVE NOT SEEN THAT BEFORE’.

How do the leaders in our Church expect us to trust & follow them when they do appalling things like this?

Is this the beginning of the New False Mass…..the Abomination of Desolation?

God help us…..please help us!!!

PS 1. I cannot verify that this is Yucca bread, but I can tell you it is yucky bread ….that they should not be using.

The traditional & pristinely white host is reflective of the Perfection, Purity, Power & Divinity of the One that this bread becomes at the point of Consecration in the Mass. And when we are looking at Jesus in times of Adoration we immediately sense that we are looking at God. These brown hosts look dirty and are not worthy of the One the bread becomes and I think are potentially even blasphemously disrespectful.

Also, the question must be asked…..even if this bread is not made of the Yucca root powder, but is made of wheat flour …..if it has impurities in it, which are not of the wheat flour…..is the Consecration valid?????

The use of brown or wholemeal type bread seems to indicate that the clerics using it think of the consecrated host as being more Bread, than being the Body, Blood Soul & Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ. In these times where such a high percentage of lay Catholics & clergy think of the Eucharist more of being symbolic of Jesus’ Presence than actually being His Presence, we must question everything we sense to be out of order in regard to It.

I have personally met a number of priests who believe it is symbolic not Real…..and I first met some of them over 37 years ago!!!

PS 2  If you enlarge the picture of the bottle that contains the hosts, you will see that they were manufactured in the EU.

God bless,

Tony M     “ (10/10/2019)

The Archbishop previously:

    • Headline: “Conclusions from the Synod on the Family: Brisbane’s Archbishop Coleridge”       (Sunday, October 25, 2015 )

Excerpts:

“Archbishop Coleridge .. at the synod spoke about divorced and remarried couples and same-sex couples, saying: “I personally think it’s just not in touch with reality to say there is no good in those relationships.”

“Archbishop Coleridge has even been described in LGBTQ media as a bishop who gets it.”

.’... And as I listened to Pope Francis speak, I thought, “this is the voice of Peter”.”

“It’s either light or darkness, good versus evil, all or nothing, and I just don’t think that’s the way human life works”

    • During the Synod on the Family in 2015 Coleridge argued against using the terms “intrinsically disordered” or “evil” to describe homosexual acts
    • The Archbishop’s advent letter ( 2016)

…The challenge now is not to abandon the faith in favour of the facts, but to create a new engagement of the faith with the culture of which we’re part – as the logic of the Incarnation demands….” 

and also:

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2016/08/21/the-bishop-of-brisbane-joins-the-throng/

and also the article in LifeSite News:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/catholic-archdiocese-allows-sacrilegious-sexually-charged-fashion-show-in-a

The Amazon Synod is not yet over. There will be many more bishops speaking of, and implementing ideas which are not of Christ’s Church.

We must continue to be alert and aware!  – as Abp. Fulton Sheen said (see pic. above) – the laity must remind the priests and bishops of their duties as shepherds.

Stop the Synod: Fasting and Prayer – Request from Card Burke and Bp. Schneider

AM+DG

Stop the Synod (Part 2)

Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider have called on the faithful to engage in a crusade of prayer and fasting for forty days. 

Reason given:   To prevent “serious theological errors and heresies” in the Amazon Synod’s working document from being approved!

This starts tomorrow!!!

Begins :        September 17 

Ends:           October 26.

Suggested format:     One decade of the Rosary daily

                                                                             Fast one day per week.

The six errors are:

  • an implicit pantheism identifying God with nature and the universe
  • the notion that paganism is a source of Divine Revelation and an alternative pathway to salvation
  • the idea that natives already received divine revelation and that the Church in the Amazon needs a missionary and pastoral “conversion”
  • granting ministries to women and turning married local chieftains into second-class priests
  • considering man as a mere link in nature’s ecological chain and economic development as an aggression against ‘Mother Earth’
  • calling for an “integral ecological conversion” which includes the adoption of the collective social model of natives where individual personality and freedom are undermined.

https://catholicismpure.wordpress.com/2019/09/12/burke-and-schneider-launch-crusade-the-six-amazon-errors/

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/crusade

 

Why talk of schism?  So cunning, so deceptive…so …

AM+DG

Beware.

I was shocked when I heard it but I knew I shouldn’t have been. He knows what’s coming; what’s inevitable – people are waking up to him. He had to get his foot in first.

My initial thoughts were: What is he talking about? He is the one who is schismatic. Schism means to break away from Christ’s Church which holds all His Teachings. We (those faithful to Christ’s teachings ) are sticking to the Truth handed down by Christ and the apostles. They are creating the schism – in fact the false prophet (or anti -pope, imposter,) and his Freemason friends  are the ones who are slowly, brick by brick, dismantling the church – the structure and the doctrines/teachings – all that makes us Catholic. They are slowly building their own new church. But we, on the other hand are sticking to the original true Church – to Christ’s teachings. They are the schismatics.But you know, it is a very clever tactic. It is called  tu quoque.  

This means to  charge your accuser with whatever it is you’ve just been accused of rather than refuting the truth of the accusation made against you. In fact, FP/PF is a devious political opponent who commits many logical fallacies and straw man arguments.

It will come to the point where the faithful will have to choose to follow Christ’s teachings, not those of the Usurper’s church. This is already happening now but who knows what is in store for us after this next synod? When people speak with their feet and return to the safety of traditional priests, he will be able to say: ‘See? I told you so. They are leaving the Catholic faith.’ Many of  these poor souls will then be so confused. They don’t really know the correct teachings of the church anymore. They will want to STAY,  thinking they must remain loyal, but not realizing that to be Catholic they have to stay loyal to Christ’s teachings . If the pope isn’t true to Christ’s teachings, then he isn’t Catholic!

He reels them in with his twisted and forked tongue: “I pray that there be no schism” but “I am not afraid”. He said “I pray that there will be none, because what is at stake is people’s spiritual health”. He adds truth to lies. He is the one ruining the people’s spiritual health. 

And I think he is afraid. The more souls he loses to the Truth, the fewer that will be led in to the One World Religion and the fewer that will worship the Anti-Christ. He does not want people to see through this great deception.

He said: “Let there be dialogue, let there be correction if there is an error, but the schismatic path is not Christian,” he said. His critics were putting ideology over Catholic doctrine and deserved sympathy, not hostility.”

It is all upside down and back to front. There has been pointed out to him many errors by some very highly regarded and lettered bishops ( eg Dubia ) but he refuses to answer any of them, let alone correct them. He doesn’t accept correction and frequently ignores it!

“..ideology over Catholic Doctrine..” He means his critics (the conservative, traditionalist faithful Catholics who are loyal to the Truth) are ideologists and not Catholic. He is implying that he is being true to Catholic doctrine, when in actual fact, he is the one destroying it. It is again, upside down and back to front. And ideology and doctrine are not opposed to one another. And traditional Catholics always hold doctrine as vitally important in forming ideology. Whereas, PF tramples doctrine and destroys it, in order to espouse his own false ideologies.

He is very clever at deflecting anything negative. For example, “The social things that I say are the same things that John Paul II said, the same things. I copy him. But they say, ‘the Pope is a communist.’” We know how he twisted Pope John Paul II’s words by omitting parts of it and making it suit his own agenda in ‘Amoris Laetitia’. In his case, he actually is a communist  and focuses on humanism and other Marxist ideas.

The sad part is that people will fall for it!! Even if they don’t recognize how he is destroying Catholic doctrine and usurping God’s Commandments – why aren’t they horrified at his lack of charity when speaking of those who pose a threat to him and at his very coarse language at times??  St Francis of Assisi in his prophecy of the two popes called him ‘not a true pastor, but a destroyer”

We all know who fits this description of one who turns everything upside down and inside out, who deceives: it is the King of lies. This so-called pope’s actions are of a diabolical nature.

All this talk of schism. Where did this come from? It’s not all just getting his foot in first. Why mention it now? It’s not as if anyone is currently a real threat to him. There is too much fear amongst the clergy for anyone to move on anything, although there is plenty of evidence.

No, this is because of what he is about to launch!

 

 

https://catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2019/09/11/the-schism-controversy-is-just-one-of-the-big-issues-on-the-popes-plate/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/11/pope-says-not-afraid-split-catholic-church-accuses-critics-stabbing/

 

*This post has been a joint effort by Remnant Survivor and Remnant child of Mary

When a pope “speaks”: What if he is not the Pope?

AM+DG

 Cardinals give a clue 

Background information:

A friend (Tony M.) sent me an article: When is a “pope” not a pope?

Posted on July 27, 2019 by Steven O’Reilly

https://romalocutaest.com/2019/07/27/when-is-a-pope-not-a-pope/

He refers to two statements by Cardinal Müller:

“On the Synodal Process in Germany and the Synod for the Amazon,” (posted on LifeSiteNews)  at https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cardinal-mueller-no-pope-or-council-could-permit-female-deacons-it-would-be-invalid

and also

Vatican’s former doctrine head criticizes Amazon synod working doc for ‘false teaching’ posted on Tue Jul 16, 2019 at: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vaticans-former-doctrine-head-criticizes-amazon-synod-working-doc-for-false-teaching

 Steven O’Reilly, in the first article, discusses specific statements made by Cardinal Müller in the other two articles.

He discusses the legal situation of an hypothetical “ex-cathedra statement” and the implications of this. He comes to a surprising conclusion.

The post below contains extracts from Steven O’Reilly, but the subheadings are mine. There was so much to take in, that this is how I made it clear to myself.

Click on the articles above to read them in full

_____________________________

Cardinal Müller’s viewpoint:

In the most recent commentary, rejecting the possibility of female deacons, Cardinal Müller writes the following :

“The Magisterium of the Pope and of the bishops has no authority over the substance of the Sacraments (Trent, Decree on Communion under both species, DH 1728; Sacrosanctum Concilium 21). 

This means:

“Therefore, no synod – with or without the Pope – and also no ecumenical council, or the Pope alone, if he spoke ex cathedra, could make possible the ordination of women as bishop, priest, or deacon. They would stand in contradiction to the defined doctrine of the Church. It would be invalid. Independent of this, there is the equality of all baptized in the life of Grace, and in the vocation to all ecclesial offices and functions for which exercise the Sacrament of Holy Orders itself is not necessary.” (On the Synodal Process in Germany and the Synod for the Amazon by Cardinal Gerhard Müller, text posted by LifeSiteNew, 7/26/2019)

 

A hypothetical scenario –  The implications of an ex-cathedra statement by PF

Cardinal Mueller’s advice to the faithful if such an event occurs:

The first — obviously — what the Cardinal says explicitly, i.e., that such an “ex cathedra” declaration, in the Cardinal’s mind, would be invalid, and thus should be disregarded by the Faithful.

 

But what about papal Infallibility? (the bad news)

There is an obvious difficulty in that  Vatican I defined the dogma of papal infallibility in the following terms:

“…the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when carrying out the duty of the pastor and teacher of all Christians in accord with his supreme apostolic authority he explains a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, through the divine assistance promised him in blessed Peter, operates with that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer wished that his church be instructed in defining doctrine on faith and morals; and so such definitions of the Roman Pontiff from himself, but not from the consensus of the Church, are unalterable.”  (Pastor Aeternus cited in Fundamentals of Catholic Doctrine, Denzinger, 1839)

In addition, this definition is followed by a canon, which states:

 “But if anyone presumes to contradict this definition of Ours, which may God forbid: let him be anathama” (Denzinger 1840).

 

Then why would Cardinal Müller state that such an ex-cathedra statement could be disregarded? (The good news)

“… But, the Cardinal is no dummy as to suggest ex cathedra statements can be disregarded. This suggests, to me at least, a hidden, unstated and inescapable implication in the Cardinal’s statement, as well as being an indication of how he and other Cardinals are now privately viewing Pope Francis–though this is speculative.”

 

What are the logical implications (according to Steven O’Reilly)

“… Given that a true pope is protected by the Holy Spirit from teaching an error ex cathedra, it follows that if a man, seemingly “pope,” were to teach something which denies or conflicts with a known truth of the Catholic Faith it must be either

(1) the man thought to be “pope” was never a true pope to begin with, or

(2) the man thought to be “pope” had, at some point in the past, already fallen through heresy or apostasy from the Petrine office. 

 

Steven O”Reilly: Reading between the lines

…. It does suggest, along with other statements from the likes of Cardinal Brandmuller, that some in the “resistance” are reaching the point where they can bend no more.”

Postscript (added Jan 2020): It has now been definitively proven that Benedict never  renounced the ‘munus’, which means he never validly renounced the papacy at all. This of course means he is still the pope and Bergoglio is nothing now, nor ever was, anything- except for a heretical bishop who should be automatically excommunicated. Further information on this is available at the FromRome blogsite.

PF/FP Destructuring the Structure – Part 4

AM+DG

Tactics for future destructions to be implemented.

Marie-Julie Jahenny’s prophecy:

“There will be a book of the ‘second celebration’ by the infamous spirits who have crucified Me anew and who await the reign of a new Messiah to make them happy. Many holy priests will refuse this book sealed with the words of the abyss, but unfortunately there are those who will accept it, and it will be used.”

Pius XII prophesied:

“I am worried by the Blessed Virgin’s messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a Divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the true Faith of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her historical past.”

 

  • The new Mass for which a secret Commission was established

An article by Fra Cristoforo on 03/01/2017 announced that there is a (secret) private commission made up of Catholics, Lutherans and Anglicans, to “change the Mass”. http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3530742/posts  

It was reported that a Secret committee working on an ecumenical Mass reported by Marco Tosatti, who listed Archbishop Piero Marini and a modernist lay liturgist – Andrea Grillo as being some of those involved.  He claimed that Cardinal Sarah has not been officially informed. See “firstthings.com” This confirms Fra Cristoforo’s article published 10 months previously on 03/01/17

Prophecy from the Book of Truth:  

“My dearly beloved daughter it is I Jesus Christ who came in the flesh.   …

The work of the deceiver has infiltrated My church on every level. Very soon now, slowly but surely, you will see Holy Masses being reduced. You will see the removal of special prayers and some of the sacraments such as confession begin to diminish. I call on My sacred servants now to listen to Me and pray for discernment. …

You will be asked to show allegiance to the False Prophet very soon. See him for what he is and judge his works in order to see if they bear fruit. For the fruit that he and his slavish devotees will yield will be rotten to the core. One bite will destroy your allegiance to Me. Two or more bites will drive such a wedge between you and My Sacred Heart that you will find it almost impossible to enter My Father´s Kingdom.

Watch carefully now the changes you will see creeping in within your own ministry. Some of these adjustments will not seem to be a problem in the beginning. But as time moves on certain changes will be forced upon you and you will be made to swallow lies. The lies will come from Satan and will be dressed in sheep´s clothing.

For those pure of heart you will know instantly and will recognise the evil cunning in place which is being designed to destroy My church on earth from within its own corridors.

…

Many changes will be introduced which will contradict the word of My Eternal Father. These changes, My sacred servants, won’t be of divine origin and you must reject these untruths if you want to remain loyal to Me. Wake up. Stand up to those lies you will have to face. Never accept them. My Eternal Father´s word will never change. It can never be adjusted by mankind. Many of you will be so distraught that you will find yourselves isolated from your fellow Sacred Servants. Fear not for there is only one side you can choose. That will be side where I stand. There is no other side.

Your beloved Saviour

Jesus Christ” 

(Tuesday, September 13th, 2011 @ 03:15 pm)

https://missionofsalvation.com/Message-0191/

 

  • Oath of allegiance to Francis by Council of Cardinals on 13th Feb. 2017.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-council-of-cardinals-pledge-allegiance-to-pope-francis   

Fra Cristoforo reveals that the process for the oath for the clergy has begun – outlined by Pope Francis is his new document “Veritatis Gaudium”. This confirms Dr Kelly Bowring’s warning of 14th Jan. 2018

Email received 3 Feb. 2018 from Fra Cristoforo:

  “Brief note: the oath of fidelity to Bergoglio begins today in the Faculties of Theology”.  The new Apostolic Constitution on the Faculties of Theology promulgated today by the Holy See is called Veritatis Gaudium. Signed by Bergoglio.

Look what is written in numbers 26 and 27 (referring to teachers) of this Constitution:

  1. 26 §2: “Those who then teach matters concerning faith and morality must be aware that this task must be carried out in full communion with the authentic Magisterium of the Church and, in particular, of the Roman Pontiff …”. That is Bergoglio. Be careful. In matters of faith and morality. In communion with Bergoglio. Ergo … Amoris Laetitia. n. 27: “Those who teach disciplines concerning faith and morality must receive, after having issued the profession of faith, the canonical mission of the Grand Chancellor or his delegate”.

Profession of faith towards whom? Obviously it will be towards the new magistero of Bergoglio.

(Http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/it/apost_constitutions/documents/papa-francesco_costituzione-ap_20171208_veritatis-gaudium.html

 An oath of allegiance for all clergy to make to Bergoglio – NOT to Christ’s teachings. Any priest who takes this oath will be trapped.

Prophecy from the Book of Truth:

“… They will be asked to pledge their allegiance, through a new oath, to remain faithful to the Church. They will not be asked to place their faith in Me or My Holy Word. Instead, they will swear allegiance to the new self-proclaimed leaders who have taken over the Chair of Peter.” (18 Aug. 2013)

Read the whole message here: https://missionofsalvation.com/Message-0880/

 

  • The ‘New Evangelisation’ document

This is to be released at the end of this month. It was leaked that this would dissolve all the Congregations (of the Faith, of the liturgy, etc) and all the Pontificial Councils and these would be replaced by ‘Dicasteries’. These would all be led by bishops and each bishop will be able to make his own decisions. In addition it was stated that ‘evangelisation would take priority over Doctrine.!!! The latter is a very clever tactic to water down and even completely dissolve what is left of the true Faith.

 

  • The upcoming Synod in the Amazon in October.

PF will use this synod to start the groundwork for implementing more of the changes. The ’Instrumentum Laboris’ (working document) has just been released. You can see by these tweets (see below) what is intended. We can be assured that PF/FP does not want to just make these changes here in the Amazon – but it will then flow on to the rest of the world. The Catholic Faith will no longer be Catholic and as you can see, will have elements of paganism. The” rigidity of discipline” is mentioned, and also the “pastoral care” that “accompanies and integrates”.

Catholic Sat @CatholicSat

Thread of some highlights from the Insrumentum Laboris of Special Assembly of the Synod of Bishops for the Pan-Amazon Region

98 the “integration of indigenous theology with ecotheology is suggested” in the formation of candidates to Holy Orders.

n.98 “The teaching of Pan-Amazonian indigenous theology in all [Catholic] educational institutions is required”

n.98 “deepen an existing Amazonian Indian theology, which will allow a better and greater understanding of indigenous spirituality, in order to avoid those historical errors that have run over many original cultures.”

n.98 “For example, it is necessary to take into account the myths, traditions, symbols, rituals and celebrations of origin, which include transcendent, communitarian and ecological dimensions.”

104 “To favor a Church as an institution of non-self-referential service, co-responsible in the care of the Common House and in the defense of the rights of the peoples.”

128 “Begin with the spirituality lived by the indigenous peoples, in contact with nature and their culture, so that they can be enlightened by the newness of the dead and risen Christ and in Him to reach fullness.”

128 “Recognize indigenous spirituality as a source of wealth for the Christian experience.”

126 “There is a need for a process of discernment in relation to the rituals, symbols and celebratory styles of indigenous cultures in contact with nature, which must be assumed in the liturgical and sacramental ritual.”

126 “It is suggested that the liturgical celebrations be festive, with their own songs and dances, in tongues and with original costumes, in communion with nature and with the community.”

126 “A liturgy that corresponds to their own culture, to be the source and summit of their Christian life (SC, 10), and linked to their struggles, sufferings and joys.”    (Whoa!!! I thought that the Eucharist was the “source and summit of the christian Life!!!”)

n 126 “The sacraments should be a source of life and medicine accessible to all (EG 47), especially to the poor (EG 200). It is asked to overcome the rigidity of a discipline that excludes and alienates, in favor of a pastoral sensitivity that accompanies and integrates (AL 297)”

126 “Instead of leaving communities without the Eucharist, the criteria for selecting and preparing the ministers authorized to celebrate it should be changed.”

126 “In view of a salutary “decentralization” of the Church (EG, 16), the communities ask Episcopal Conferences to adapt the Eucharistic rituals to their own cultures.”

129 “To promote indigenous vocations of men and women, in response to the needs of pastoral-sacramental attention; its decisive contribution consists in the impulse for an authentic evangelization from the indigenous point of view, according to its uses and customs.”

129 “Affirming that celibacy is a gift to the Church, it is requested that in the more remote areas of the region the possibility of the ordination of the elderly, preferably indigenous, men respected and recognized by already having a stable family”

129 “That the Church increasingly welcome the feminine style of acting and understanding events.”

129 “Identify the type of official ministry that can be conferred on women, considering the central role they play today in the Amazon Church.”

Prophecy from the Book of Truth:

“Pagans, on the other hand, in their quest for spiritual peace, seek out the Creation of the True God, rather than their Creator. Instead of laying themselves before God, My Father, the Almighty, Creator of all things, they lie prostrate before false idols, including the wonders He created for the world – the Earth, the sun, the moon and the stars….( 24 Sept.2013)

 

 

 

 

St Bridget of Sweden prophesy:

Our Lady explained to St. Bridget of Sweden, that a pope that would allow priests to marry, would go to hell.

“But now I shall tell you God’s will in this matter……
Know this too: that if some pope concedes to priests a license to contract carnal marriage, God will condemn him to a sentence as great, in a spiritual way, as that which the law justly inflicts in a corporeal way on a man who has transgressed so gravely that he must have his eyes gouged out, his tongue and lips, nose and ears cut off, his hands and feet amputated, all his body’s blood spilled out to grow completely cold, and finally, his whole bloodless corpse cast out to be devoured by dogs and other wild beasts. Similar things would truly happen in a spiritual way to that pope who were to go against the aforementioned preordinance and will of God and concede to priests such a license to contract marriage.

For that same pope would be totally deprived by God of his spiritual sight and hearing, and of his spiritual words and deeds. All his spiritual wisdom would grow completely cold; and finally, after his death, his soul would be cast out to be tortured eternally in hell so that there it might become the food of demons everlastingly and without end.”

 https://gloria.tv/article/PRV2YJx1AKsU1dKu88KDWnLmf

 

 Tomorrow: Destructuring the Structure – conclusion