Category: The Battle for the Church

Prophetic advice to the Church of The End Times Foretold through the Ages

AM+DG

 

Part 1 – From the Bible and the The Saints

Deuternomy 13:1-4

“If a prophet arises ... and tells you of signs or wonders and if the signs and wonders take place, and he says, ‘Let us follow other gods which you have not known and let us worship them.’ You must not listen to the words of that prophet... The Lord your God is testing you to find out if you love Him with all your heart, and with all your soul. It is the Lord your God you must follow…”

(A prophet that tells us to follow other gods – like perhaps Bergoglio who joined in the worship of the Pachamama idols then, carried them in procession, established them to be honoured in a Catholic church, and even put an offering on the altar during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass –  is obviously the “False Prophet” (as in Revelation). As God tells us in the quote above – “The Lord your God is testing you to find out if you love Him with all your heart, and with all your soul. It is the Lord your God you must follow…”)

Deuteronomy 13:6-7

“If your very own brother, or son or daughter, or the wife that you love, or you closest friend secretly entices you saying, ‘Let us go and worship other gods,’ gods that neither you or your fathers have known, gods of the people around you whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other, do not yield to him or listen to him…”

Daniel 7:25

[25] “And he shall speak words against the High One, and shall crush the saints of the most High: and he shall think himself able to change times and laws, and they shall be delivered into his hand until a time, and times, and half a time.” (Note: A time, and times, and half a time: That is, three years and a half; which is supposed to be the length of the duration of the persecution of Antichrist.)

(We can certainly see how the false prophet has accomplished these things – “speak words against the High One” and “crush the saints of the most High”, he has changed” times and laws”)

 Lk 18:8

“The Son of Man, when He cometh, shall He find, think you, faith on earth?”

Matt. 24: 25-28

 “Behold I have told it to you beforehand. So if anyone says there he is in the desert, do not go, or here he is in the inner room, do not believe it. For as lighting comes from east to west, so will be the coming of the son of man, (Jesus). Wherever there is a carcass, there the eagles will be gathered.”

2 Peter 3:3-13

“ 3.First of all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. 4 They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’ he promised?

St. Paul the Apostle (2 Thess 2:7-11)

“For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way. And then that wicked one shall be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of his mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming, him, Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders, And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying: That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have consented to iniquity.“

(St Paul tells us that evil is already working, but the “wicked one” cannot be revealed while “he who now holds (Benedict) is taken away”. That is, until he leaves the Vatican. This is verified by Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich when she said on October 1, 1820:

“The Church is in great danger. We must pray so that the Pope may not leave Rome; countless evils would result if he did.…”

“The Little Black Man in Rome, whom I see so often, has many working for him without their clearly knowing for what end. He has his agents in the New Black Church also. If the Pope leaves Rome, the enemies of the Church will get the upper hand...”

This fact about the Pope leaving Rome is again mentioned by St Paul in verse 5 below:)

St. Paul the Apostle to the Thessalonians: 2: 1-12

1 “And we exhort you, brethren, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together unto Him 2 that you be not easily shaken in mind, nor be terrified, neither by spirit nor by word, nor by letter, as sent from us, as if the Day of the Lord were at hand. 3 Let no man deceive you by any means, for that day will not come unless there first comes the revolt and the revealing of the Man of Sin, the Son of Perdition, 4 who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sits in the Temple of God showing himself as if he were God [Dan. 11:36,37; Ezek.28:2].

5 Do you not remember that when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 6 And now you know what has been restraining him [from being revealed], that he may be revealed in his time.“

(See comment above)

Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, III, q. 64, art. 2, ad. 3

“The apostles and their successors are God’s vicars in governing the Church which is built on faith and the sacraments of faith. Wherefore, just as they may not institute another Church, so neither may they deliver another faith, nor institute other sacraments.”

(We can certainly see that the Faith and the Sacraments on which the Church is built, is being destroyed and replaced with social justice -“the new humanism”- scarcely any mention of God is made. Amoris Laetitia has destroyed the Sacrament of Marriage and this then affects the Sacrament of Penance. The Amazon Synod has begun the processof destroying Holy Orders. )

St. Nicholas of Flue, in Catholic Prophecy, edited by Yves Dupont, p. 30

“The Church will be punished because the majority of her members, high and low, will become so perverted. The Church will sink deeper and deeper until she will at last seem to be extinguished, and the succession of Peter and the other Apostles to have expired. But, after this, she will be victoriously exalted in the sight of all doubters.”

St. Francis de Sales, Introduction to the Devout Life, Part III, Chapter 29

“The declared enemies of God and His Church, heretics and schismatics, must be criticized as much as possible, as long as truth is not denied. It is a work of charity to shout: ‘Here is the wolf!’ when it enters the flock or anywhere else.”

(I love this quote and the following one.. We are often told by our dear good priests, to be charitable, that we shouldn’t judge, that we should not cry out – but popes and saints tell us otherwise. Of course we must be careful to cry out against their actions and not the person. We can’t just leave it to the bishops. It is the laity who must cry out. We are all part of the Mystical Body)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, a Doctor of the Church

De Controversiis on the Roman Pontiff, trans. Ryan Grant (Mediatrix Press: 2015), Book II, Chapter 29, p. 303.

“Just as it is licit to resist the Pontiff that aggresses the body, it is also licit to resist the one who aggresses souls or who disturbs civil order, or, above all, who attempts to destroy the Church. I say that it is licit to resist by not doing what he orders and by preventing his will from being executed…”

 

Next post:  Part 2 – Advice from the Popes

A Church of HIV has no courage against the Corona Virus

via A Church of HIV has no courage against the Corona Virus

by Br. Alexis Bugnolo

The Bergoglians are running in terror. They have closed worship in two entire dioceses in Northern Italy. They are refusing to distribute the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar in mouths. They are positively terrified.

It makes no sense, since the Corona Virus only attacks those who are already in poor health and most of these are the very elderly who cannot make it to church anyhow.

But it makes sense if the leadership of your Church is HIV positive, because you have no or a very weakened immune system.

Those who want to make up their religion have no supernatural motives and no real hope of eternal life. They know that, because they know that howsoever much they might pretend, their god, themselves, is not a god and cannot save them from Death.

Catholics on the other hand continue to go bravely to Mass and to communion, placing all their hope in the God of Life who rose from the death and can protect His own from eternal death and temporal death.

Many Catholics in Italy have never accepted communion in the hand. This current trial is helping many open their eyes to the fact that the Bishops in communion with Bergoglio are atheists, that is, they believe in nothing but their own ideologies. They have, thus, no courage or hope against the Corona Virus.

The closing of Churches and refusal of the Sacraments, however, shows that the Bergoglian Church has the long term goal to close churches and end the Sacraments. They want a religion where you pay them to enjoy themselves in debauchery, and to receive from them the thinking points for the one world order.  All those who insist Bergoglio is the pope are collaborators with that agenda whether they want it or not.

Please join us to pray for our Cardinal!

AM+DG

Novena for the spiritual and temporal needs of His Eminence, George, Cardinal Pell
(Monday 2nd March – Tuesday 10th March, 2020)

Cardinal Pell’s appeal will be heard by the High Court of Australia on 11th and 12th March.

This novena was organized by http://newmanparish.org/

Memorare to Our Lady

(This version of he Memorare is from the 1741 edition of the Couleste Palmetum)
Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that anyone who fled to thy protection, implored thy help, or sought thy intercession
was left unaided by thee.
Inspired with this confidence, I fly to thee, Mary, Virgin of virgins, Mother of Jesus Christ; to thee do I come; before
thee I stand, sinful, sorrowful and trembling.
O Mistress of the World and Mother of the Word Incarnate,
despise not my petitions,
but in thy mercy hear and answer wretched me crying to thee in
this vale of tears.

Be near me, I beseech thee, in all my necessities, now and always, and especially at the hour of my death.
O clement, o loving, o sweet Virgin Mary. Amen.

Prayer to St John Fisher

O GOD, Who didst grant to Thy blessed Bishop John, the grace courageously to give his life for truth
and justice, grant through his intercession and example that we may so lose our life in this world for
Christ, that we may find it in heaven.
Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Your Son, Who liveth and
reigneth with You in the unity of the Holy Ghost, one God, for ever and ever, Amen.

Prayer to St Thomas More

O GOD, Who didst bestow upon the blessed Martyr Thomas –  the grace to embrace Thy Cross with a
joyous and resolute spirit amidst the snares of the world, and the sufferings of prison and death, grant,
we pray Thee, through his intercession and example, that eagerly striving for faith and justice we may
merit to come to the joys of everlasting life.
Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Your Son, Who liveth
and reigneth with You in the unity of the Holy Ghost, one God, for ever and ever, Amen.

Mary, Mirror of Justice, pray for him.
St John Fisher, pray for him.
St Thomas More, pray for him.

It’s Time to Stand up for His Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI

AM+DG

Finally, after all this time – years of suffering and seeing the Church being torn apart –  we can see a light. We were always thankful that (just) a few bishops seemed to try and stand up for Truth – but talking about it, and signing petitions wasn’t enough. Cardinal Burke, Bp. Schneider, Cardinals Muller and Brandmuller, also Cardinals Caffara and Meisner (the latter 2 who may have  died of  a broken heart), Cardinal Sarah, and last, but not least, Archbishop Vigano, who I must say seems to have had the most courage.

We are immensely thankful for Bro. Alexis Bugnolo who acted and decided to investigate Pope Benedict’s resignation. At first, after Bergoglio was elected to the throne of Peter, there were a few assertions made- the “Grammar mistake“, the fact that on the day of the election there was one too many voting elections ( contrary to Canon Law, it was said); the St Gallen Mafia plotting for years beforehand (and Cardinal Danneels finally admitting it in a book), secret meetings in Rome for purposes of vote canvassing, suggestions of being forced to resign, and even blackmail, but they never came to anything. No-one really seemed to care, or was afraid to challenge the election.

As a result of Bro. Bugnolo’s relentless investigation, he came up with lots of evidence written and applied to Canon Law. And now we have 2 Bishops who have spoken up for Pope Benedict – Bp. Gracida and Bp. Lenga. Bro. Bugnolo tells us that there are at least 4 priests naming Pope Benedict in the Canon of the Mass.

There are hundreds of Jesus to Mankind  prayer groups around the world -and that means supporting Pope Benedict as the true pope. So thousands of people when attending Mass, have been saying his name in the Canon from the beginning. (That is, since Nov. 2010 in our case, but depending on when people joined) All of the thousands of members of our prayer groups would be also praying for the intentions of Pope Benedict after every Rosary.

Locally, I know of one priest who has said (privately) that all the pieces of the jigsaw are finally coming together. He said that he never really believed that Pope Benedict resigned.

There are most probably hundreds of good priests who are secret supporters of Pope Benedict. But they lack courage, and they are in fear  – fear of their Bishop, and fear of what other priests might think.

I was so overjoyed to read the” From Rome” post.

“Feb. 28, 2020: A group of Catholics, today, has issued a call to convene an international investigation into Vatican Corruption by all the Bishops of the Catholic Church “on account of the manifest grave disorder in the organs of the Apostolic See.  …   The Press Release invites both legal scholars and Catholic Bishops to participate. All interested parties are to contact the chairman of the committee.

Read all about it here: https://fromrome.info/2020/02/27/breaking-call-for-international-inquest-into-vatican-corruption/

I hope many, many people sign up, but I know that there are still bishops and priests who are sceptical or just plain “blind”. This is our job now – to share our information. Hand out copies of articles to other parishioners and to priests. They need to know the truth. We need to build up an ARMY of resistance and Action. Remember, Ven. Abp. Fulton Sheen spoke about the important role of the  laity.

Priests may fear for their  “priestly ministry”, but we have no excuse. We can change parishes and “go shopping” and they cannot deny us the Sacraments.

+++++

My friend Tony, sent me this reflection yesterday, Feb. 27th at 11.20am Sydney time.  He says it all very well.

Hi Everyone,

Surely the idea or possibility of an uncanonically elected Pope……following a Pope pressured to resign by the St Gallen Mafia Club…. led by the infamous heretic Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini….is a more plausible explanation of a manifest, serial heretic, blasphemer and Vatican Garden idol worshipper…… being on the Chair of Peter….. than the idea that a validly elected Pope could operate like that.

Anyone who believes that a valid Pope can behave as Bergoglio has done for almost 7 years now, has a greatly diminished (flawed) understanding of the very essence of what a Pope is.

It has always been my (Traditional Catholic) understanding that a Pope is the ‘Rock’…..the defender….teacher….and custodian…. of the True Faith…..protected by God Himself from reeling off a never ending stream of heresies, blasphemies to the Catholic faithful all over the planet.

Bergoglio is definitely not the ‘Rock’. 

And if anyone reading this cannot see that…..you are not looking…..and need to ask yourself why am I avoiding looking too closely at what he is saying and doing???

I know many, many pre-Bergoglio traditional Catholics (now Bergoglio Liberals) who avoid like the plague ….all the available information on Bergoglio’s performance.

Therefore the need for a full and comprehensive investigation on how this parlous state of affairs came about is screamingly obvious. 

Why not check out all possible ways this may have come about???

Why are so many so resistant to investigating all possibilities???

Was he a heretic before he was supposedly elected???  There is strong evidence for the affirmative.

Was there pressure on Benedict (still alive and healthy in mind and body) to resign….. when on an historical basis Popes simply don’t resign….they stay until they drop….look at the example Pope John Paul II gave….. Was Canon332:2 breached???   There is a strong case for that!!!

Was the canvassing for votes at the 2013 (supposed) conclave actually done by a number of Cardinals???    There is a strong case for that also!!! Both Cardinal Daneels & Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor’s former  Director for Public Affairs, Austin Ivereigh have said this indeed happened!!!

Now that it has become clear that Jorge Mario Bergoglio….compared to the Popes of history is dysfunctional in the extreme….behaving like the worst of all the antipopes…..WHY NOT CHECK IT ALL OUT???

COME ON ….WHY NOT???

Reason No 1. Many of the Hierarchy are themselves heretics and with Bergoglio all the way.

Reason No 2. Many of those hierarchy who see clearly the errors of Bergoglio do not have the will to take this on……the (worldly) consequences would be great!!!

Then we of course have the brave ones….Bishop Gracida….Archbishop Lenga….Archbishop Vigano…..and others…..but not many…..because our Church has been thoroughly liberalised (hereticised ) over the last 50 years since Vatican II.

God bless,

Tony

+++++

“From Rome” just released another post:

“Call for International Inquest into Vatican Corruption”

Read it at: https://fromrome.info/2020/02/27/breaking-call-for-international-inquest-into-vatican-corruption/

 

Also, don’t forget to read: https://fromrome.info/2020/02/26/pope-benedict-is-now-flanked-by-2-bishops/

https://fromrome.info/2020/02/25/archbishop-lenga-benedict-xvi-is-the-pope-and-bergoglio-is-an-antichrist/

and

https://fromrome.info/2020/02/25/bishop-gracida-joins-archbishop-lenga-in-denying-bergoglio-is-the-pope/

 

 

 

The Rock

AM+DG

Only the Successor of Peter can be “The Rock” on which the Catholic Church stands.

This article by Bro Alexis Bugnolo by describing how Luther, Calvin and Henry VIII led the Church into apostasy, but –

“… no part of the Church has even fallen into a Apostasy when it remained united to the true Pope. …

This is why now 99.99% of the Catholic Church is being led into Apostasy. Because they are no longer united in reality with the true Pope, though many are still fooled about this.

And this is why Bergoglio has such power. Because the first sin, which gives him power over you, is in holding that Pope Benedict XVI resigned the papacy, when 5 minutes of examination of Canon Law and the Papal Declaration can prove that he never resigned.  …”

He concludes with:

“If priests want to be truly effective, you need to return to communion with the Vicar of the Sacred Heart of Jesus: Pope Benedict XVI. Bergoglio will never have that effect, because he is the Vicar of nobody, but the vain imaginations of giddy Cardinals who were, as Pope Benedict XVI implied on Feb. 11, 2013, not competent to elect his Successor.”

This is a very thought provoking article. Read it all at the link below:

via The Rock

We can see what has happened to the Church since the usurper took over.

There is widespread apostasy – never seen on a scale like this before; heresies and blasphemies abound; paganism has been introduced into the Church and the Amazonian synod consecrated to the idols of Pachamama ( i. e. to evil).

This usurper mocks the holy and has a knack of twisting Christ’s teachings into meaning something that they do not mean. He has approved of persons indulging in sins of the worst kind in the name of “tolerance”. He introduced Amoris Laetitia into the Magisterium through a back door (by means of a letter). He has profaned the Sacraments

He actually calls people names, especially faithful Catholics. There has never been a “pope” such as this : quite “unholy”.

Let’s face it. Francis is the THE False Prophet (of Revelation). He is preparing the world for the Anti-christ.

Ven. Archbishop Fulton Sheen said:“The False Prophet will have a religion without a cross. A religion without a world to come. A religion to destroy religions. There will be a counterfeit church. Christ’s Church [the Catholic Church] will be one. And the False Prophet will create the other. The false church will be worldly, ecumenical, and global. It will be a loose federation of churches. And religions forming some type of global association. A world parliament of churches. It will be emptied of all divine content and will be the mystical body of the Antichrist.“

Sadly, we can see all this happening before our eyes.

Prophecies from the Book of Truth:

“This pope may be elected by members within the Catholic Church, but he will be the false prophet. His electors are wolves in sheep’s clothing and are members of the secret Masonic and evil group led by Satan. This is how Satan will try to destroy My Church. Sadly, he will, this false prophet, attract a large following. Those who oppose him will be persecuted.“ – April 12th, 2012

“They plan to replace the Holy Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI, with a dictator of lies. He will create a new church in league with the antichrist and his group, in order to deceive the world.” – January 18th, 2012

“My beloved Pope Benedict XVI is the last true pope on this Earth”. – April 12th, 2012

See more prophecies about The False Prophet  in the next post

Pope Benedict still acts like the Pope and this gives us comfort.

AM+DG

Pope Benedict XVI is not afraid to speak up, when necessary.

1.Earlier this month there was  one journalist who spoke about  “bookgate”.

The book written By Sarah and Benedict undermined the announcement of the pretend pope-  the False Prophet – of his Exhortation on the Amazonian Synod. The “Instrumentem Laboris”  for the synod had been announced weeks beforehand. It was evident what was on the agenda. Pope Benedict and Cardinal Sarah took action. Their book on celibacy was written and published before the pretend pope was able to announce his exhortation.  It was reported that he was angry! He was afraid that he would lose some of the support that he had hoped for. Not surprisingly, these matters then, were not addressed directly in the Exhortation. But you have to read between the lines. He DID say, that he DID NOT NEED to go over the final document of the synod, because wqe should READ IT FOR OURSELVES. Some very naïve people, who want only to be reassured that this (pope?) has some goodness and Truth left in him, thought that a BIG MISTAKE had been avoided.

In an article describing this event( February 13, 2020 ), Br. Alexis Bugnolo wrote:

” Sandro Magister has at last spilled the beans — as we say in English — that is, he has told us what really happened during the recent Book Flap over the defense of the Priestly Celibacy by His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI and Cardinal Robert Sarah, the only Cardinal in any position in the Roman Curia, who was appointed to his office by Pope Benedict XVI.

The Main Stream Media has run with the story that it was Bergoglio who fired Archbishop Georg Gänswein for not preventing that Book from going to press and obstructing its publication as a work of the Cardinal and the Pope.

But Magister, apologist extraordinaire for the Argentine Regime at the Vatican, in a report on his official Blog at L’Espresso, says what really happened. In a post entitled,Il silenzio di Francesco, le lacrime di Ratzinger e quella sua dichiarazione mai pubblicata – in which he speaks in a noticeable intent to humiliate the reigning Pontiff by calling him by his civil name — he says that it was Benedict who first detected Gänswein’s treachery and took decisive action to circumvent his interference.

Magister (explains):

Well, the morning of Wednesday, January 15th, while pope Francis was holding his weekly general audience and Gänswein was sitting, according to the rule, at his side in the Paul VI Hall, far indeed from the Monastery Mater Ecclesiae which is the residence of the Pope Emeritus, of whom he is the secretary, Benedict XVI personally picked up the phone and called Sara first at his home, where he did not find him, and then in his office, where the Cardinal picked up.

Benedict XVI expressed, in a heartfelt manner, his solidarity with Sarah. He confided in him that he had not understood the reasons for such a violent and unjust aggression.  And he wept. Sarah also wept. The phone call ended with both of them in tears.

Magister also reports that Cardinal Sarah and Pope Benedict then wrote up a joint Statement and had Gänswein bring it over to the sostituto of the Secretary of State,

Thus it is not surprising in the least that the communication written by the Pope and Cardinal never saw the light of day. But Magister says, that the Italian Version of the Book, was defended by the Publisher a few days later, with a public statement crafted by Cardinal Parolin himself, word for word, praising the book.

…

“…But the real news is this. Pope Benedict XVI is as fiesty as ever. He had no illusions about the Archbishop which would have made him hesitant to break faith with him and make his own phone call behind the Archbishop’s back. He then began direct relations with Cardinal Sarah and was devastated to hear how his former personal secretary had betrayed him in the public press.

… The events related by Magister point to a significant moment in history. That was when Pope Benedict XVI unplugged Gänswein. The Italians call it, defenistrazione, which is a colorful word deriving from Late Latin, meaning to throw someone out of their office through the window, rather than letting them resign with dignity by leaving the office through the door after a resignation.

That is really why the Archbishop disappeared. Bergoglio could not fire him. Only the Pope can do that.”

From:

https://fromrome.info/2020/02/13/benedict-not-francis-unplugged-ganswein/

2. Pope Benedict had spoken up (July 17, 2017) at Cardinal Meisner’s funeral  when he said that

“he was moved at the dubia cardinal’s ability to “live out of a deep conviction that the Lord does not abandon His Church, even when the boat has taken on so much water as to be on the verge of capsizing.”

The Church “stands in particularly pressing need of convincing shepherds who can resist the dictatorship of the spirit of the age and who live and think the faith with determination,” Pope Benedict said in a message read by Archbishop Georg Gänswein, his personal secretary and head of the papal household. Because of this “pressing need,” Meisner “found it difficult to leave his post.”

The article also stated:

” Canon lawyer Kurt Martens said Pope Benedict’s message was an “amazing yet diplomatic form of support for [the] dubia Cardinals.”

In June 2017, Pope Benedict met new cardinals alongside Pope Francis. He had a brief message for them: “The Lord wins in the end.”

https://revelationstwelve.wordpress.com/2017/07/17/pope-benedict-xvi-sobering-message-at-cardinals-funeral-church-on-verge-of-capsizing/

3. More recently he was impelled to correct the error regarding clerical sexual abuse at the US Conference of Bishops in April, 2019:

Pope Benedict’s letter re Clerical sexual abuse to USCCB April 2019

By Jason Horowitz

  • April 11, 2019

ROME — In his retirement, Pope Benedict XVI is apparently tired of hiding.

The former pontiff, who declared he would “remain hidden to the world” when he became the first pope in six centuries to abdicate in 2013, has released a 6,000-word letter that puts the blame for the clerical sexual abuse crisis in the Roman Catholic Church on the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the disappearance of God from public discourse in the West and what he considers dangerously liberal theological ideas that eroded morality after the church reforms of the Second Vatican Council.

…

The deeply theological and esoteric missive, which Benedict called his contribution “in this difficult hour” for the church, was written “absolutely on his own” by Benedict, according to Archbishop Georg Gänswein, Benedict’s longtime personal secretary, who is also the prefect of the papal household under Pope Francis.

…

In writing the letter, Benedict realized the fears of many church experts who have argued that having two pontiffs living at the same time was a recipe for pastoral, theological and political disaster and could lead to confusion among the faithful.

Although Benedict wrote that he gave his successor and the Vatican’s Secretariat of State a heads up about the letter, it amounted to the most significant undercutting yet of the authority of Pope Francis, who has instead blamed a systemic abuse of power and an unhealthy adoration of authority within the church’s hierarchy for the crisis.

Read the whole article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/world/europe/pope-benedict-letter-sex-abuse.html    

and also read about it here:

https://www.biography.com/news/pope-francis-pope-benedict-relationship

“The letter publicly undercut Francis, whose views on the subject had already been made public. “

4. Finally, there are other ways that  Pope Benedict XVI speaks up, not in words, but visually.

The following is taken from Ann Barnhardt’s English transcript of her video:

0:55:57 Visual evidence.

Pope Benedict continues to wear the Papal White and his Papal Ring. Pope Benedict was asked, ‘why do you still wear,’ after he had faux-abdicated and run off, ‘why do you continue to wear the Papal White?’ And the answer he gave was such a massive, bald-faced lie that the first thing that occurred to me was this has got to be a coded cry for help. Again, you don’t want to be a conspiracy theorist and all that, absolutely, but listen to what he said. He said there weren’t any black cassocks for him to wear. You announce your intention to abdicate three weeks before the effective date, so he announces on 11 February and the effective date is 8:00 pm on the 28th of February, so you’ve got basically three weeks here, and you live in Rome, a city that has more black cassocks than any city on the face of the earth. And you’re the Vicar of Jesus Christ on earth. You can’t pick up the phone and call one of the clerical outfitters, or whoever your personal tailor is, and say, look, I need a black cassock, presumably with red piping, or just a black cassock? It’s such a bald-faced lie that, in charity, one has to assume that he’s trying to signal. That he’s desperately trying to signal something. I’m wearing the Papal White because there weren’t any black cassocks for me to wear. He’s made this decision. This is his free choice. He could have gotten a full new wardrobe anytime he wanted in the past five and a half years, and yet every day he gets on and he puts on the Papal White. He gets up and he puts on the Papal White. And he continues to wear his Papal Ring.

0:58:11 Pope Benedict retains his Papal name, Pope Benedict.

This is breaking all previous precedent and also the wearing of the Papal White. That also breaks all previous precedent. In previous precedent, whenever a Pope would resign, he gave up every physical indication of the Papacy. He reverted to black, he dropped, of course, the Papal name, he reverted to being Cardinal so-and-so, or Bishop so-and-so, or Abbot so-and-so, whatever it was, so that there would be absolutely no confusion about anything. And then he went very far away. So, Pope Benedict retains his Papal name, he’s called Pope Benedict, and his Papal Style. The Papal Style is the courtesy title that someone is given and in the case of the Pope it’s Your Holiness/His Holiness/Holiness. He is still called, all day every day, His Holiness Pope Benedict, or His Holiness Pope Emeritus, but as we’ve talked about, the whole notion of a Pope Emeritus is completely false. Non-existent. It’s a fiction. He’s chosen this. He could have said get me a black cassock and go back to calling me Cardinal Ratzinger, Archbishop Ratzinger, whatever he wanted. He could’ve reverted to that. Did he do that? Does he do that? No. Every day he gets up and he retains these visible signs of the Petrine Office.

0:59:46  Pope Benedict continues to reside in the Vatican, completely unprecedented.

All resigned Popes, they would either go away completely voluntarily, never to be seen again. They would go check into a monastery somewhere, and they would never be seen publicly again, or they were chased out. A lot of times these were completely contentious situations, and the Pope would be chased out, and sometimes he was even imprisoned. Pope Benedict could’ve gone anywhere. In fact, he was on the record before all of this happened in February of 2013, as saying that all he wanted to do before he was elected Pope in 2005, his big, grand plan was he wanted to go back to Bavaria. He wanted to live in a little house with his brother, Georg Ratzinger, and their sister, who was alive at the time, and his cat, and play the piano, and write, and live out the rest of his life like that. Why didn’t he do that? He could have. Why didn’t he do it? Why is he still living inside the Vatican and making public appearances as the Pope? We have this incredible visual evidence. It’s right in front of us. …

Read all of Ann’s article here:

Bergoglian Antipapacy Video Transcript

5. Other signals Pope Benedict XVI gives.

The pope’s signature is usually in the format “NN. PP. x”  (Supreme Pontiff)  (Pastor Pastorum)

From  Antonio Socci  of Church Militant:

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pope-francis-church-that-goes-out-is-goingoutof-catholicism

“… The signals he gives are always discreet, but clear and comforting. Not only by means of powerful interventions like the document he issued last April, but also by recalling that he – that is, the pope – is there and Catholics should not feel that they are orphans.

The latest (truly beautiful) book which Ratzinger has published, “Per Amore,” does not carry on its cover the title “Pope Emeritus” but the firm signature “Benedetto PP XVI.” These initials “PP” stand for “Pastor Pastorum” (or Pater Patrum), which is the title and prerogative of the reigning pontiff. “

Antonio Socci, also mentions in this article his “coat of arms”

Socci says:

“There are those who believe that by a mysterious design of Divine Providence, the Church is being subjected to a very harsh trial, its own Good Friday, but that the presence of Benedict guarantees that She will not be shipwrecked. Certainly Benedict is central in the Church today. And one day everything will become clearer. “

________________________________

Bro. Alexis Bugnolo states (see link below):

“Notice the facts, which are indisputable:

  1. Benedict is dressed as the Pope.
  2. All continue to treat him as the Pope.
  3. He is given official escort as a Head of State by the Italian Republic
  4. He flies, not to Munich, where his brother lives, but to Castel Gandolfo, the private residence of THE POPE.

Any objective observer must therefore conclude, that he remains the Pope, and is signaling that he remains the Pope. Because he is acting as the Pope, retiring from a Vatican that no longer wants him, but NOT as a Pope who has just resigned the Papacy.

https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/09/15/benedict-said-in-every-way-that-he-did-not-resign-an-examination-of-his-testimonies/

________________________________

It’s no wonder then, that  the “pretend pope” (Francis) got angry about the recent book by  PBXVI and Card. Sarah!

His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI may not seem to speak up very often, and it must be so difficult to do so, while he is constantly being watched, but he still certainly makes his presence felt!

He might be old, but his very presence must be a thorn in the side of the enemy!

 

 

 

Abp. Bergoglio+Scandal= Pope Francis+Scandal

AM+DG

A History of Scandal! What else could you expect?

A friend, whom I often quote on this site, sent me an article about an Argentinian bishop, who made an observational comment about Bergoglio, based on personal experience, from when they were both bishops in Argentina.

“Mario Bergoglio, Archbishop of Buenos Aires Vs. Archbishop Hector Aguer, Archbishop of La Plata.

They were both auxiliary Bishops in Buenos Aires between 1992 and 1998.

In 1998 Bergoglio was installed as  Archbishop of the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires and  Archbishop Hector Aguer as Archbishop of the Archdiocese of La Plata.

We were told by our conservative Catholic hosts that their perception was that Archbishop Aguer had always been the orthodox/traditional one..…. and that Bergoglio was perceived to be the radical liberal.

Aguer is generally considered a representative of the conservative sector of the Argentine Church. In homilies and episcopal documents, he has harshly criticized the proposed legalization of abortion in Argentina, some government-sponsored sex education plans and contraception campaigns, the secularisation of culture, the idea of abolishing the requirement of clerical celibacy, the persecution of and discrimination against Christians, consumerism, “rock culture”, etc.

Now the point is that Archbishop Aguer was the Archbishop that these orthodox/true Catholics from the Buenos Aires area trusted and believed was upholding the authentic Catholic faith…….definitely not Bergoglio… he was a renowned ‘lefty’.

Interesting that in our Church today that the Traditional (orthodox) priests and bishops seem to be assigned the lesser parishes and dioceses.

In this case, the radical lefty gets the bigger diocese and finishes up on the Chair of Peter.    

And it is also very interesting to have Archbishop Aguer now emerge and point out that Bergoglio is considered a ‘moral relativist’.

Remember Pope Benedict back in April 2005, criticizing the dictatorship of relativism….’We are building a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one’s own ego and desires.’……...and we know who the ‘dictator of relativism’ is in 2020.       …

Tony”

The article follows:

Argentinian Archbishop: Francis Is Considered A “Moral Relativist”

The politicians who are about to introduce abortion in Argentina, are “morally relativists,” and they must think “that Pope Francis is one too,” former La Plata Archbishop Hector Aguer wrote on InfoCatolica.com (February 1).

…

Arguer observed that Fernández and his second concubine received Communion from Argentinean-born Archbishop Sánchez Sorondo during a Eucharist in the Vatican,

“This is incredible, but between fellow countrymen of the same rank everything is finally possible. One more scandal, among many others…”

See: https://gloria.tv/post/j8BP4AjkKeA94kxoMvv2zz9fT

What this confirms (important for all those who are still doubters) – is that Bergoglio has not changed.

I will add here an article written by a Buenos Aires journalist  about Bergoglio, on the day he was elected. At the time, it seemed rather extreme to many people, (except for those who read the Book of Truth) .

From:  https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-horror-buenos-aires-journalist.html

” We have many friends around the world, including in the dear Argentine Republic. And we asked a cherished friend, Marcelo González, of Panorama Católico Internacional, who knows the Church of Argentina as well as the palm of his hand, to send us a report on the (then) new pope. Here it goes:
Horror!

Of all the unthinkable candidates, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is perhaps the worst. Not because he openly professes doctrines against the faith and morals, but because, judging from his work as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, faith and morals seem to have been irrelevant to him!

A sworn enemy of the Traditional Mass, he has only allowed imitations of it in the hands of declared enemies of the ancient liturgy. He has persecuted every single priest who made an effort to wear a cassock, preach with firmness, or that was simply interested in Summorum Pontificum.

Famous for his inconsistency (at times, for the unintelligibility of his addresses and homilies), accustomed to the use of coarse, demagogical, and ambiguous expressions, it cannot be said that his magisterium is heterodox, but rather non-existent; for how confusing it is.

His entourage in the Buenos Aires Curia, with the exception of a few clerics, has not been characterized by the virtue of their actions. Several are under grave suspicion of moral misbehavior.

He has not missed any occasion for holding acts in which he lent his Cathedral to Protestants, Muslims, Jews, and even to partisan groups in the name of an impossible and unnecessary interreligious dialogue. He is famous for his meetings with Protestants in the Luna Park arena where, together with preacher of the Pontifical House, Raniero Cantalamessa,he was “blessed” by Protestant ministers, in a common act of worship in which he, in practice, accepted the validity of the “powers” of the TV-pastors.

This election is incomprehensible: he is not a polyglot, he has no Curial experience, he does not shine for his sanctity, he is loose in doctrine and liturgy, he has not fought against abortion and only very weakly against homosexual “marriage” [approved with practically no opposition from the episcopate], he has no manners to honor the Pontifical Throne. He has never fought for anything else than to remain in positions of power.

It really cannot be what Benedict wanted for the Church. And he does not seem to have any of the conditions required to continue his work.

May God help His Church. One can never dismiss, as humanly hard as it may seem, the possibility of a conversion… and, nonetheless, the future terrifies us.”

___________________

This was written 7 years ago and only speaks of his previous history!!!

How much more can we add today and how true to form  this picture is! How on earth, we may ask, could he slip through and even be considered a candidate for election with this history?  Don’t the bishops do their homework? Perhaps the good bishops were outnumbered – a distinct possibility.  But if they did know what to expect and they were outnumbered, why don’t they speak up now? Only a few speak out- very occasionally, I might add.

Why don’t they shout it from the rooftops? (as Bro. Alexis Bugnolo does in his posts.)

Jesus tells us what they should be doing in Matthew 10:

“Courage Under Persecution. 26  “Therefore do not be afraid of them. Nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, nor secret that will not be known.  27 What I say to you in the darkness, speak in the light; what you hear whispered, proclaim on the housetops. 28 And do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna .29 Are not two sparrows sold for a small coin? Yet not one of them falls to the ground without your Father’s knowledge. 30 Even all the hairs of your head are counted. 31 So do not be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows. before my heavenly Father. 33 But whoever denies me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father.

Previous to this advice, Jesus warned us of these times:

“Coming Persecutions. 16 “Behold, I am sending you like sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and simple as doves. 17 But beware of people, for they will hand you over to courts and scourge you in their synagogues,18 and you will be led before governors and kings for my sake as a witness before them and the pagans. 19 When they hand you over, do not worry about how you are to speak or what you are to say. You will be given at that moment what you are to say. 20 For it will not be you who speak but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you. 21 Brother will hand over brother to death, and the father his child; children will rise up against parents and have them put to death. 22 You will be hated by all because of my name, but whoever endures to the end will be saved. 23 When they persecute you in one town, flee to another.Amen, I say to you, you will not finish the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes. 24 No disciple is above his teacher, no slave above his master. 25  It is enough for the disciple that he become like his teacher, for the slave that he become like his master. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul,* how much more those of his household!”

Food for thought.

We have to do our bit – shout it from the rooftops. Perhaps if there is a loud enough outcry, we may have some impact – at least to recognize who the true pope is! This is the first step. And God knows that Pope Benedict need our prayers and our whole-hearted support.

 

Don’t be fooled! (Querida Amazonia) Part 1

AM+DG

I was surprised that so many people after reading the recent apostolic exhortation “Querida Amazonia”, say things like n- “Well that was lucky, we dodged a bullet”. Really? These are good Catholics who are aware of, and disturbed by, the goings-on in the church. How could they be so naive? A leopard doesn’t change his spots. We have had 7 years of his antics, why would he change now? The pretend pope is cunning.

The truth is that Pope Benedict and Cardinal Sarah knocked him out of his comfort zone. They decided to write a book about celibacy, it seems right after the “Instrumentem Laboris” was published last year. They were one step ahead. They knew what was coming.

It was kept secret and then released just before the pretend pope could announce his apostolic exhortation of the Amazonian Synod. It seems he was very angry! But why would he be angry if he wasn’t intending to change the rule about celibacy? It seems Gänswein didn’t do his job properly as a spy, between the households of the Pope and the pretend pope, and as a result suffered the brunt of the pretend pope’s anger.

So when the pretend pope didn’t explicitly mention “celibacy” and “women deacons”, the blind faithful reacted with joy. But they missed the point, he was just very cunning about it.

Read the document here: http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20200202_querida-amazonia.html

“POST-SYNODAL APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION

QUERIDA AMAZONIA

OF THE HOLY FATHER
FRANCIS

TO THE PEOPLE OF GOD
AND TO ALL PERSONS OF GOOD WILL”

Let’s just examine a few excerpts as an example:

  1. “During the Synod, I listened to the presentations and read with interest the reports of the discussion groups. In this Exhortation, I wish to offer my own response to this process of dialogue and discernment. I will not go into all of the issues treated at length in the final document. Nor do I claim to replace that text or to duplicate it. I wish merely to propose a brief framework for reflection that can apply concretely to the life of the Amazon region a synthesis of some of the larger concerns that I have expressed in earlier documents, and that can help guide us to a harmonious, creative and fruitful reception of the entire synodal process.”

* What this means:
The whole synod document is a footnote to this apostolic exhortation,
and the pretend pope (pp or FP as in False Prophet)  has not closed the door on women priests or married priests.

  1. “In the Eucharist, God, “in the culmination of the mystery of the Incarnation, chose to reach our intimate depths through a fragment of matter”. The Eucharist “joins heaven and earth; it embraces and penetrates all creation”.[116] For this reason, it can be a “motivation for our concerns for the environment, directing us to be stewards of all creation”.[117] In this sense, “encountering God does not mean fleeing from this world or turning our back on nature”.[118] It means that we can take up into the liturgy many elements proper to the experience of indigenous peoples in their contact with nature, and respect native forms of expression in song, dance, rituals, gestures and symbols. The Second Vatican Council called for this effort to inculturate the liturgy among indigenous peoples;[119] over fifty years have passed and we still have far to go along these lines.[120]”

* What this means:
The first commandment is abolished and paganism is now officially incorporated into the Mass

  1. “At the same time, I would like to officially present the Final Document, which sets forth the conclusions of the Synod, which profited from the participation of many people who know better than myself or the Roman Curia the problems and issues of the Amazon region, since they live there, they experience its suffering and they love it passionately. I have preferred not to cite the Final Document in this Exhortation, because I would encourage everyone to read it in full.”

**That means he is supporting everything entailed and described and recommended in the final Document of the Synod. He is just not going to mention it in the exhortation. Instead he wants everyone to read it and study it in full. In other words, all of it is so important, that he wants us all to study it in its entirety.

  1. “Everything that the Church has to offer must become incarnate in a distinctive way in each part of the world, so that the Bride of Christ can take on a variety of faces that better manifest the inexhaustible riches of God’s grace. Preaching must become incarnate, spirituality must become incarnate, ecclesial structures must become incarnate. For this reason, I humbly propose in this brief Exhortation to speak of four great dreams that the Amazon region inspires in me.”

** This means the Church will no longer be “One, holy, catholic and Apostolic. The church will be different all over the world. Preaching and spirituality will become ‘incarnate’ – i.e. reflecting each separate culture – paganism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism  you name it. The real Incarnation of God made man and the preaching of it will become extinct.

  1. ” I dream of an Amazon region that fights for the rights of the poor, the original peoples and the least of our brothers and sisters, where their voices can be heard and their dignity advanced.

I dream of an Amazon region that can preserve its distinctive cultural riches, where the beauty of our humanity shines forth in so many varied ways.

I dream of an Amazon region that can jealously preserve its overwhelming natural beauty and the superabundant life teeming in its rivers and forests.

I dream of Christian communities capable of generous commitment, incarnate in the Amazon region, and giving the Church new faces with Amazonian features.”
 

**I dream too – of a Church where Christ’s voice can be heard – where people everywhere can recognize Christ’s teaching; where the beauty of our Faith, founded by Jesus Christ, the Son of God shines forth. Christian communities who are ‘incarnate in the Amazon region which give the Church new faces with Amazonian features’ – is my worst nightmare!

  “CHAPTER ONE
A SOCIAL DREAM”

“CHAPTER TWO
A CULTURAL DREAM”

“CHAPTER THREE
AN ECOLOGICAL DREAM”

The titles of the chapters say it all – it is communism, Marxism, – in fact it is the “new humanism” which the pretend pope(FP) told us about last year. Read paragraphs 8-27 in the Vatican Exhortation. See link above.

“CHAPTER FOURTH
AN ECCLESIAL DREAM”

“journey alongside” (Where have we heard that before?)

  1. “As she perseveres in the preaching of the kerygma, the Church also needs to grow in the Amazon region. In doing so, she constantly reshapes her identity through listening and dialogue with the people, the realities and the history of the lands in which she finds herself. In this way, she is able to engage increasingly in a necessary process of inculturation that rejects nothing of the goodness that already exists in Amazonian cultures, but brings it to fulfilment in the light of the Gospel.[84] Nor does she scorn the richness of Christian wisdom handed down through the centuries, presuming to ignore the history in which God has worked in many ways. For the Church has a varied face, “not only in terms of space… but also of time”.[85] Here we see the authentic Tradition of the Church, which is not a static deposit or a museum piece, but the root of a constantly growing tree.[86] This millennial Tradition bears witness to God’s work in the midst of his people and “is called to keep the flame alive rather than to guard its ashes”.[87]

** Really? The church constantly reshapes her identity…? a museum piece?  “keep the flame alive – ? which flame? The only flame I see is paganism, which the pretend pope wants to intertwine with Christ’s Church. And he refers to longstanding unchanged Tradition as ashes!

“The inculturation of the liturgy

81. The inculturation of Christian spirituality in the cultures of the original peoples can benefit in a particular way from the sacraments, since they unite the divine and the cosmic, grace and creation. In the Amazon region, the sacraments should not be viewed in discontinuity with creation. They “are a privileged way in which nature is taken up by God to become a means of mediating supernatural life”.[114] They are the fulfillment of creation, in which nature is elevated to become a locus and instrument of grace, enabling us “to embrace the world on a different plane”.[115]”

** Well, that’s the weirdest description of liturgy and the Sacraments I have ever heard! “nature is taken up to God”,… “fulfillment of Creation”…(nature) “mediating supernatural life”. Actually, the pretend pope is saying that nature is a god and  “is elevated to become a locus and instrument of grace”.  

Well, that is just a little taste.  I don’t want to read any more. You get the drift. We can’t trust the pretend pope. We should know that by now. He is the “False Prophet” of Revelation. He is the one preparing for, and paving the way for the Antichrist. All his actions point to it.

He is destroying the Church and making way for a church of darkness.

It’s all in the prophecies.

 

The FP/PF and his “New Humanism”: Prophecies spell it out in detail

AM+DGFP/PF announcd a “global event” in May to discuss a “new humanism”.

He actually mentioned this last year. I guess the “New evangelisation” probably goes hand in hand with this. (but I’m sure he’s saving this for later.) If you missed our posts last year on Pope Francis, Humanism, its links and what it means, see:

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2019/09/24/connecting-the-dots-part-1-the-new-humanism-and-pope-frances/

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2019/09/26/connecting-the-dots-part-2-humanism-and-its-links/ 

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2019/09/28/connecting-the-dots-part-4-the-new-humanism-errors-and-prophecy/

https://remnantdisciplesjtm.com/2019/09/22/new-humanism-our-lady-of-la-salette-st-francis-of-assisi/

On his announcement on the event to be held in May, one of Tony M’s friends (David) commented on the FP and his announcement of the “New Humanism”. Our articles (see links above)  also connected this to messages in the Book of Truth. Everything connected with the End Times is in this book and Jesus tells us what to expect. David has compiled a very extensive list of quotes, some of which I have dealt with in our previous posts (see links above). Take David’s advice and read then all in full.

You can access these messages at: https://missionofsalvation.com/  (and a few other places). Just go to the site, then “messages” and search for the date. The messages are all in chronological order.

David’s  says:

 “You have all no doubt heard of the meeting the FP Bergoglio has called for in Rome this coming May.  May 14, 2020 to be exact. His call to establish a “new humanism” surprises some, goes right over the heads of others, but does not surprise in the least those of us who are blessed to have studied the messages in the Book of Truth.  

 In his rambling 500 word announcement (in which there was not a single mention of Jesus or God), Bergoglio said “We need a global compact on education aimed at developing a new universal solidarity and a new humanism. So, I wish to endorse a global event to take place on May 14, 2020.”  If you have not read this announcement, you should to have additional context.

 Occasionally, something Bergoglio says prompts me, as it might you, to look to see what the Book of Truth says about it. I did so in the case of this announcement, using the word “humanism.” Not surprisingly, there are 14 Book of Truth messages which include this word.  As with any of the Book of Truth messages, it is nearly impossible to take any single part, out of context of the entire message, but nevertheless I have done so below. To the surprise of none of us, the messages we see in the Book of Truth stands in stark contrast to what Bergoglio is calling for, as proven in these excerpts:

Excerpts of messages on “Humanism”

December 25, 2014:  Jesus:  Humanism is an affront to God because it focuses on man’s needs and not the need to repent of sin before the Creator of all that is.

August 8, 2014:  Mother of Salvation: Humanism will become the substitute for Christianity where no mention of God will be uttered

June 27, 2014:  Jesus: My Church, when it divides and falls, will embrace humanism with great relish

July 27, 2013:  Jesus: Look behind the mask of humanism and you will not find signs of God…Be careful when you embrace humanism, because when you do, you cut yourselves off from Me.

March 4, 2015: Jesus: Confusion does not come from Me. My Word is clear, My Teachings infinite. Humanity has embraced humanism and atheism as a substitute for Me.

June 30, 2014: Jesus: You will betray Me; deny Me and embrace My enemies, for you will be so caught up in the new religion – the secular humanism, which will come as a wolf dressed in sheep’s clothing to devour you – that I will be forgotten.

June 28, 2014: Mother of Salvation: Many new rules will be introduced into my Son’s Church on Earth, as thousands of newcomers will be sworn into the Church and they will not be authentic, for they will not have the True Spirit of Christ within their hearts. They will enter the Church and will bear witness to a new one world religion, which will not honour my Son, Jesus Christ. Not only will they not serve Him, their duty will be to serve the needs of humanism, which will, at its very core, deny the Existence of the Supernatural State of God and all that He stands for.

June 6, 2014: Mother of Salvation: (regarding the “new book” to be published) It will be everything that is the opposite to the True Word of God. It will be a book, which sets out to evangelise the world into believing in the importance of humanism.

April 18, 2014: Jesus: My Crosses will begin to disappear and while My Churches, and those who say they serve Me, talk about the importance of humanism, you will not hear talk of the importance of surrendering to Me, Jesus Christ, your Saviour.

December 10, 2013: Jesus: “ …how it pains Me to see so many people accept the false humility, which lies behind the humanism, which is so favoured by those in My Church. When did you, who call yourselves servants of God, decide to replace the True Word of God with your own flawed interpretation of it? When did you decide to replace Christianity with humanism, where no mention is made of Me? “(David’s note: In Bergoglio’s announcement he made NO MENTION of Jesus.)

November 9, 2013: Jesus: They will use the message of humanism, love of one another, in terms of your ability to look after the poor, uneducated and needy, as a substitute for the Truth you were given in the Gospels.

June 3, 2013: Jesus: Most importantly, it (Paganism) will be presented as being harmless fun for those who dabble in new age practices and as being an important part of personal development – a form of humanism and love of self.

May 19, 2013: Jesus: It will be presented to the world as a new form of social justice – a new form of humanism, when all the needs of man are catered for. These needs will include the right to sin, but these sins will, in defiance of God, be seen to be the moral rights of man.

March 29, 2013: Jesus: Showing concern for the needs of fellow human beings is admirable.  But when you promote the physical well-being of the needs of man over their spiritual needs it is not I, Jesus Christ, you follow. Humanism is not Christianity.

I strongly recommend reading the above messages in their entirety. Especially in the lead-up to this meeting in Rome on May 14. Also, I recommend reading Bergoglio’s entire 500-word announcement. This will certainly be a difficult moment for the Church, especially in the wake of what is expected in the final document on the Amazonian “synod” which should be out within the next couple of weeks.  

God bless,

David.”

See:  Pope Francis invites religious, political leaders to sign ‘Global Pact’ for ‘new humanism’ at:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-global-education-pact